Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach

Stiffened panels are extensively used in aerospace applications, particularly in wing and fuselage sections, due to their favorable strength-to-weight ratio under in-plane loading conditions. This research employs the commercial finite element software Ansys- 19 to analysis the critical buckling and ultimate collapse load of an aluminum stiffened panel having a dimension of 1244 mm (Length) × 957 mm (width) × 3.5 mm (thickness), with three stiffener blades located 280 mm away from each other. Both the critical buckling load and post-buckling ultimate failure load of the panel are validated against the experimental data found in the available literature, where the edges towards the length are clamped and simply supported, and the other two edges are free. For nonlinear buckling analysis, a plasticity power law is adopted with a small geometric imperfection of 0.4% at the middle of the panel. After the numerical validation, the investigation is further carried out considering four different lateral pressures, specifically 0.013 MPa, 0.065 MPa, 0.085 MPa, and 0.13 MPa, along with the compressive loading boundary conditions. It was found that even though the pressure application of 0.013 MPa did not significantly impact the critical buckling load of the panel, the ultimate collapse load was reduced by 18.5%. In general, the ultimate collapse load of the panel was severely affected by the presence of lateral pressure while edge compressing. Three opening shapes—namely, square, circular, and rectangular/hemispherical—were also investigated to understand the behavior of the panel with openings. It was found that the openings significantly affected the critical buckling load and ultimate collapse load of the stiffened panel, with the lateral pressure also contributing to this effect. Finally, in critical areas with higher lateral pressure load, a titanium panel can be a good alternative to the aluminum panel since it can provide almost twice to thrice better buckling stability and ultimate collapse load to the panels with a weight nearly 1.6 times higher than aluminum. These findings highlight the significance of precision manufacturing, particularly in improving and optimizing the structural efficiency of stiffened panels in aerospace industries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machines
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/machines13050373
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach

Jakiya Sultana, Gyula Varga
5 citations
Machines
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
4.77
article

Finite Element Analysis of Post-Buckling Failure in Stiffened Panels: A Comparative Approach

Jakiya Sultana, Gyula Varga
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Stiffened panels are extensively used in aerospace applications, particularly in wing and fuselage sections, due to their favorable strength-to-weight ratio under in-plane loading conditions. This research employs the commercial finite element software Ansys- 19 to analysis the critical buckling and ultimate collapse load of an aluminum stiffened panel having a dimension of 1244 mm (Length) × 957 mm (width) × 3.5 mm (thickness), with three stiffener blades located 280 mm away from each other. Both the critical buckling load and post-buckling ultimate failure load of the panel are validated against the experimental data found in the available literature, where the edges towards the length are clamped and simply supported, and the other two edges are free. For nonlinear buckling analysis, a plasticity power law is adopted with a small geometric imperfection of 0.4% at the middle of the panel. After the numerical validation, the investigation is further carried out considering four different lateral pressures, specifically 0.013 MPa, 0.065 MPa, 0.085 MPa, and 0.13 MPa, along with the compressive loading boundary conditions. It was found that even though the pressure application of 0.013 MPa did not significantly impact the critical buckling load of the panel, the ultimate collapse load was reduced by 18.5%. In general, the ultimate collapse load of the panel was severely affected by the presence of lateral pressure while edge compressing. Three opening shapes—namely, square, circular, and rectangular/hemispherical—were also investigated to understand the behavior of the panel with openings. It was found that the openings significantly affected the critical buckling load and ultimate collapse load of the stiffened panel, with the lateral pressure also contributing to this effect. Finally, in critical areas with higher lateral pressure load, a titanium panel can be a good alternative to the aluminum panel since it can provide almost twice to thrice better buckling stability and ultimate collapse load to the panels with a weight nearly 1.6 times higher than aluminum. These findings highlight the significance of precision manufacturing, particularly in improving and optimizing the structural efficiency of stiffened panels in aerospace industries.

MachinesVol. 13(5)
University of Miskolc (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
4.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.