From entrepreneurial to managerial statecraft: New trends of urban governance transformation in post-pandemic China

The global financial crisis started a new context of late capitalism and austerity urbanism. Instead of a unidirectional governance transformation towards entrepreneurialism, rising finance and financialisation, pervasive state roles in state capitalism and post-growth municipal radicalism are competing trends. Previously, China witnessed private entrepreneurship, economic devolution, and housing commodification at the turn of the millennium. They have been portrayed as urban or state entrepreneurialism. These governance features were transformed as China entered Xi Jinping’s new era. This paper revisits the transformations in post-pandemic China and finds that rising state capital, re-centralisation of spatial governance and party-state co-governance represent the shift from entrepreneurial to managerial statecraft. The new trends broadly echo changing capital–state–society relationships in the world today. Beyond market rationality, the state mobilises capital and society to pursue strategic intentionality. The transformation has been exacerbated by pandemic urgency, post-pandemic economic downturn and greater geopolitical tension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251333304
Citations
17
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
144.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From entrepreneurial to managerial statecraft: New trends of urban governance transformation in post-pandemic China

Ying Wang, Handuo Deng, Weikai Wang, Fulong Wu et al.
17 citations
Urban Studies
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
144.88
article

From entrepreneurial to managerial statecraft: New trends of urban governance transformation in post-pandemic China

Ying Wang, Handuo Deng, Weikai Wang, Fulong Wu, Fangzhu Zhang, Yi Feng
article en
17 citations

Abstract

The global financial crisis started a new context of late capitalism and austerity urbanism. Instead of a unidirectional governance transformation towards entrepreneurialism, rising finance and financialisation, pervasive state roles in state capitalism and post-growth municipal radicalism are competing trends. Previously, China witnessed private entrepreneurship, economic devolution, and housing commodification at the turn of the millennium. They have been portrayed as urban or state entrepreneurialism. These governance features were transformed as China entered Xi Jinping’s new era. This paper revisits the transformations in post-pandemic China and finds that rising state capital, re-centralisation of spatial governance and party-state co-governance represent the shift from entrepreneurial to managerial statecraft. The new trends broadly echo changing capital–state–society relationships in the world today. Beyond market rationality, the state mobilises capital and society to pursue strategic intentionality. The transformation has been exacerbated by pandemic urgency, post-pandemic economic downturn and greater geopolitical tension.

Urban StudiesVol. 62(15)
University of Liverpool (GB), University College London (GB), Nanjing University (CN), University of Sheffield (GB)
H2020 European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
144.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.