Study on the Performance of Upstream Obstacles Under Different Exit Loads

Obstacles “upstream” of the exit significantly impact evacuation efficiency and deserve attention. Based on the discrete cellular automaton model, this paper studies the impact of different obstacle settings on evacuation efficiency in different emergency levels under different exit loads. Through simulation, we found that at low emergency levels, the appearance of obstacles has little impact on evacuation efficiency, while at high emergency levels, the changes in evacuation efficiency vary greatly under different obstacle settings: when the exit is relatively wide (evacuation pressure is low) and has the “faster is faster” effect, obstacles upstream of the exit reduce the evacuation efficiency, and setting obstacles directly opposite of the safety exit has the most obvious impact on the evacuation efficiency; while when the exit is narrow (evacuation pressure is high) and has the “faster is slower” effect, appropriately setting obstacles can slightly improve the evacuation efficiency. Our findings help to understand the impact of obstacles on evacuation efficiency under different exit loads to set upstream obstacles reasonably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8050174
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Study on the Performance of Upstream Obstacles Under Different Exit Loads

Hongpeng Qiu, Zheng Fang, Hanchen Yu
1 citations
Fire
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
1.15
article

Study on the Performance of Upstream Obstacles Under Different Exit Loads

Hongpeng Qiu, Zheng Fang, Hanchen Yu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Obstacles “upstream” of the exit significantly impact evacuation efficiency and deserve attention. Based on the discrete cellular automaton model, this paper studies the impact of different obstacle settings on evacuation efficiency in different emergency levels under different exit loads. Through simulation, we found that at low emergency levels, the appearance of obstacles has little impact on evacuation efficiency, while at high emergency levels, the changes in evacuation efficiency vary greatly under different obstacle settings: when the exit is relatively wide (evacuation pressure is low) and has the “faster is faster” effect, obstacles upstream of the exit reduce the evacuation efficiency, and setting obstacles directly opposite of the safety exit has the most obvious impact on the evacuation efficiency; while when the exit is narrow (evacuation pressure is high) and has the “faster is slower” effect, appropriately setting obstacles can slightly improve the evacuation efficiency. Our findings help to understand the impact of obstacles on evacuation efficiency under different exit loads to set upstream obstacles reasonably.

FireVol. 8(5)
City University of Hong Kong (HK), Wuhan University (CN)
City University of Hong Kong
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.