Identifying Gaps in Science Curriculum Student Learning Outcomes and Grade V Students’ Achievement

This study investigates the gaps between Science Curriculum Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Grade V students' achievement in Punjab, Pakistan, using a mixed-methods approach, analyzing Punjab Examination Commission (PEC) data (2018–2023) and teacher surveys (N=350). Results reveal significant disparities, with students achieving only 42.7% overall proficiency, while rural students underperformed urban peers by 19.5 percentage points. The weakest SLOs included Electricity & Magnetism (32.5% proficiency), Microorganisms (38.1%), and Forces & Machines (36.7%), whereas stronger performance was observed in Flowering Plants (64.2%) and the Solar System (61.8%). Key contributing factors were teacher training gaps (72% lacked inquiry-based pedagogy training), textbook misalignment (58% of SLOs not covered), and resource shortages (85% of schools without science labs). Regression analysis confirmed locale (β = -0.23, p < 0.01) and teacher training (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) as significant predictors of achievement. Qualitative findings highlighted over-reliance on rote learning and inadequate assessment feedback as systemic barriers. The study recommends SLO-aligned teacher training, revised textbooks emphasizing higher-order thinking, and equitable lab resource distribution to bridge these gaps, providing actionable insights for policymakers to enhance science education efficacy in Pakistan and similar contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indus journal of social sciences.
Published
2025-04-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59075/ijss.v3i2.1136
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Gaps in Science Curriculum Student Learning Outcomes and Grade V Students’ Achievement

K. Ahmed, Tahani Hussain, Muhammad Haseeb, Shamim Khan et al.
1 links
Indus journal of social sciences.
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Identifying Gaps in Science Curriculum Student Learning Outcomes and Grade V Students’ Achievement

K. Ahmed, Tahani Hussain, Muhammad Haseeb, Shamim Khan, Iqra Nazish, Yasir Abbas
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the gaps between Science Curriculum Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Grade V students' achievement in Punjab, Pakistan, using a mixed-methods approach, analyzing Punjab Examination Commission (PEC) data (2018–2023) and teacher surveys (N=350). Results reveal significant disparities, with students achieving only 42.7% overall proficiency, while rural students underperformed urban peers by 19.5 percentage points. The weakest SLOs included Electricity & Magnetism (32.5% proficiency), Microorganisms (38.1%), and Forces & Machines (36.7%), whereas stronger performance was observed in Flowering Plants (64.2%) and the Solar System (61.8%). Key contributing factors were teacher training gaps (72% lacked inquiry-based pedagogy training), textbook misalignment (58% of SLOs not covered), and resource shortages (85% of schools without science labs). Regression analysis confirmed locale (β = -0.23, p < 0.01) and teacher training (β = 0.31, p < 0.001) as significant predictors of achievement. Qualitative findings highlighted over-reliance on rote learning and inadequate assessment feedback as systemic barriers. The study recommends SLO-aligned teacher training, revised textbooks emphasizing higher-order thinking, and equitable lab resource distribution to bridge these gaps, providing actionable insights for policymakers to enhance science education efficacy in Pakistan and similar contexts.

Indus journal of social sciences.Vol. 3(2)
Rawalpindi Medical University (PK), Islamia University of Bahawalpur (PK), Government of Pakistan (PK), University of Education (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.