Blue acaras use pure pursuit rather than parallel navigation when pursuing robotic prey

Predators depend on their ability to accurately target and capture prey; however, identifying how predators capture highly evasive prey remains challenging. Experiments involving real predators and responsive robotic prey are a promising method to understand how predators can overcome prey escape tactics, since they allow prey behaviour to be controlled and experimentally manipulated. Using interactive robot-controlled prey, we tested how the predictability of the prey’s initial escape direction influenced the pursuit strategy adopted by blue acaras, Andinoacara pulcher . Individual fish were repeatedly presented with a single robot-controlled prey that was programmed to flee from the approaching predator. Predators experienced either predictable prey that consistently escaped in the same initial direction over successive trials or unpredictable prey that escaped in random directions, mimicking the variability that is commonly seen in the escape paths of real prey. To determine the predators' pursuit strategy, we analysed the trajectory of the predator during the period after the prey had started to escape. We compared the observed pursuit trajectories with simulated trajectories based on either pure pursuit, in which the predator steers directly towards its target, or parallel navigation, which enables the predator to intercept prey. Simulations based on pure pursuit consistently provided a better match with the observed trajectories than simulations based on parallel navigation. There was no evidence for an effect of the prey’s predictability on the type of pursuit strategy followed by the predators: pure pursuit was favoured over parallel navigation in the majority of trials, regardless of the predictability of the prey’s initial escape direction. Although our previous research has demonstrated that blue acaras adjust aspects of their behaviour in response to uncertainty about the prey’s likely escape direction, these results show that they maintain the same pursuit strategy, irrespective of the prey’s escape tactics. • We developed an experimental system involving real predators and robotic prey. • Prey were programmed to flee from an approaching acara cichlid predator. • Predators were repeatedly tested against predictably or unpredictably escaping prey. • Acaras pursued prey by swimming towards their target rather than by intercepting it. • Prey predictability did not influence the overall pursuit strategy used by acaras.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Behaviour
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123170
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blue acaras use pure pursuit rather than parallel navigation when pursuing robotic prey

Andrew W. Szopa-Comley, Christos C. Ioannou
2 citations
Animal Behaviour
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
4.63
article

Blue acaras use pure pursuit rather than parallel navigation when pursuing robotic prey

Andrew W. Szopa-Comley, Christos C. Ioannou
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Predators depend on their ability to accurately target and capture prey; however, identifying how predators capture highly evasive prey remains challenging. Experiments involving real predators and responsive robotic prey are a promising method to understand how predators can overcome prey escape tactics, since they allow prey behaviour to be controlled and experimentally manipulated. Using interactive robot-controlled prey, we tested how the predictability of the prey’s initial escape direction influenced the pursuit strategy adopted by blue acaras, Andinoacara pulcher . Individual fish were repeatedly presented with a single robot-controlled prey that was programmed to flee from the approaching predator. Predators experienced either predictable prey that consistently escaped in the same initial direction over successive trials or unpredictable prey that escaped in random directions, mimicking the variability that is commonly seen in the escape paths of real prey. To determine the predators' pursuit strategy, we analysed the trajectory of the predator during the period after the prey had started to escape. We compared the observed pursuit trajectories with simulated trajectories based on either pure pursuit, in which the predator steers directly towards its target, or parallel navigation, which enables the predator to intercept prey. Simulations based on pure pursuit consistently provided a better match with the observed trajectories than simulations based on parallel navigation. There was no evidence for an effect of the prey’s predictability on the type of pursuit strategy followed by the predators: pure pursuit was favoured over parallel navigation in the majority of trials, regardless of the predictability of the prey’s initial escape direction. Although our previous research has demonstrated that blue acaras adjust aspects of their behaviour in response to uncertainty about the prey’s likely escape direction, these results show that they maintain the same pursuit strategy, irrespective of the prey’s escape tactics. • We developed an experimental system involving real predators and robotic prey. • Prey were programmed to flee from an approaching acara cichlid predator. • Predators were repeatedly tested against predictably or unpredictably escaping prey. • Acaras pursued prey by swimming towards their target rather than by intercepting it. • Prey predictability did not influence the overall pursuit strategy used by acaras.

Animal BehaviourVol. 224
University of Bristol (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Fish Ecology and Management Studies
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.