Excision of the Proximal Pole of the Scaphoid Affects the Midcarpal Joint

Abstract Excision of the proximal pole of the scaphoid causes wrist instability. The often small proximal fragment can be challenging to retain, and multiple procedures are used to preserve the proximal pole. However, the mechanical implications of a proximal pole loss remain unclear. Possibly, under certain circumstances, the proximal pole can be excised without causing instability. This study aimed to use a validated finite element model (FEM) of normal Type 1 and Type 2 wrists to examine the effect of removal of the proximal scaphoid pole on forces moving through the midcarpal joint. We hypothesize that the amount of bone removed alters the transfer of forces through the midcarpal joint and that this effect will differ between Type 1 and Type 2 wrists. Fourteen wrist computed tomography (CT) scans were converted to .stl files: five Type 1 and nine Type 2. Using an established wrist FEM model, the proximal scaphoid was sequentially excised up to 50%. A 100-N computer-generated load was applied to the dorsal crests of the trapezoid and capitate. Carpal bone displacement was recorded in the x, y, and z directions. The percentage change from intact was calculated for Type 1 and 2 wrists, the direction of bony translation was recorded, and an index quantifying instability based on translation upon loading was calculated. The excision of the proximal pole of the scaphoid caused significant translation of the carpal bones in both wrist types, p < 0.001. Type 2 wrists reached significant displacement after 15% excision, compared to 25% for Type 1 wrists. The direction of translation differed between Type 1 and 2 wrists. In general, Type 1 wrists seem to be less stable than Type 2 wrists. This study supports the importance of scaphoid proximal pole for wrist stability and the difference in carpal–bone translation between midcarpal joint types. This can be used in surgical planning when faced with fractures, nonunion, and complex fracture-dislocations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2568-8592
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Excision of the Proximal Pole of the Scaphoid Affects the Midcarpal Joint

Ronit Wollstein, Sallie Yassin, Steven Z. Glickel, Nicholas Parody et al.
Journal of Wrist Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Excision of the Proximal Pole of the Scaphoid Affects the Midcarpal Joint

Ronit Wollstein, Sallie Yassin, Steven Z. Glickel, Nicholas Parody, Paul Izard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Excision of the proximal pole of the scaphoid causes wrist instability. The often small proximal fragment can be challenging to retain, and multiple procedures are used to preserve the proximal pole. However, the mechanical implications of a proximal pole loss remain unclear. Possibly, under certain circumstances, the proximal pole can be excised without causing instability. This study aimed to use a validated finite element model (FEM) of normal Type 1 and Type 2 wrists to examine the effect of removal of the proximal scaphoid pole on forces moving through the midcarpal joint. We hypothesize that the amount of bone removed alters the transfer of forces through the midcarpal joint and that this effect will differ between Type 1 and Type 2 wrists. Fourteen wrist computed tomography (CT) scans were converted to .stl files: five Type 1 and nine Type 2. Using an established wrist FEM model, the proximal scaphoid was sequentially excised up to 50%. A 100-N computer-generated load was applied to the dorsal crests of the trapezoid and capitate. Carpal bone displacement was recorded in the x, y, and z directions. The percentage change from intact was calculated for Type 1 and 2 wrists, the direction of bony translation was recorded, and an index quantifying instability based on translation upon loading was calculated. The excision of the proximal pole of the scaphoid caused significant translation of the carpal bones in both wrist types, p < 0.001. Type 2 wrists reached significant displacement after 15% excision, compared to 25% for Type 1 wrists. The direction of translation differed between Type 1 and 2 wrists. In general, Type 1 wrists seem to be less stable than Type 2 wrists. This study supports the importance of scaphoid proximal pole for wrist stability and the difference in carpal–bone translation between midcarpal joint types. This can be used in surgical planning when faced with fractures, nonunion, and complex fracture-dislocations.

Journal of Wrist Surgery
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.