Effect of perceived preprint effectiveness and research intensity on posting behaviour

Open science is increasingly recognised worldwide, with preprint posting emerging as a key strategy. This study explores the factors influencing researchers' adoption of preprint publication, particularly the perceived effectiveness of this practice and research intensity indicators such as publication and review frequency. Using open data from a comprehensive survey with 5873 valid responses, we conducted regression analyses to control for demographic variables. Researchers' productivity, particularly the number of journal articles and books published, greatly influences the frequency of preprint deposits. The perception of the effectiveness of preprints follows this. Preprints are viewed positively in terms of early access to new research, but negatively in terms of early feedback. Demographic variables, such as gender and the type of organisation conducting the research, do not have a significant impact on the production of preprints when other factors are controlled for. However, the researcher's discipline, years of experience and geographical region generally have a moderate effect on the production of preprints. These findings highlight the motivations and barriers associated with preprint publication and provide insights into how researchers perceive the benefits and challenges of this practice within the broader context of open science. • This study analyze the motivations and challenges of preprint posting in the context of the global open science movement. • Preprint posting is strongly influenced by researchers' productivity. • Preprints are viewed favorably for early access to research but less so for obtaining early feedback. • Demographic factors such as gender and organizational type have minimal impact on preprint posting. • Moderate effects of discipline, experience, and geography are observed.