The effects of overall slope on soil surface roughness estimation

Soil surface roughness ( SSR ) is essential for understanding and modeling soil erosion processes, while whether the overall slope of the investigated terrain surface must be corrected before SSR estimation is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the effects of overall slope on SSR and associated temporal change estimates by using the high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) from the rainfall simulation experiments of Nearing et al. (2017) wherein medium-term rainfalls (ca. 10–20 years) were simulated on a 2 m by 6.1 m stony plot under three slope treatments (5 %, 12 %, and 20 %). Square moving windows with different sizes ( W Z ) covering the topographic DEMs were used to estimate SSR for each slope treatment before and after each rainfall simulation under the slope-detrending (DT) and no-detrending (NDT) scenarios. Results showed that: (1) The estimated SSR linearly increased with W Z under the NDT scenario while it increased rapidly for small W Z and tended toward asymptotes for large W Z under the DT scenario. (2) With increasing window size, the standard deviations of SSR increased under the NDT scenario but decreased under the DT scenario. (3) Without correcting the overall slope effects, SSR was overestimated while the temporal change of SSR was significantly underestimated reaching up to −175 % as compared to the DT scenario, and the underestimation was positively correlated with slope gradient, the true SSR temporal change, and window size. We mathematically illustrated that the estimated SSR under the NDT scenario in fact consisted of oriented roughness that was resultant from the systematic elevation variation rather than soil surface random roughness alone, and the overall slope effects must be corrected before SSR estimation for effectively tracking SSR temporal changes. The results provide guidance about the level of accuracy one might expect in evaluating SSR and associated temporal changes at hillslopes with different overall slopes. • Soil surface roughness (SSR) was overestimated due to the overall slope effect. • SSR temporal change was underestimated without correcting the overall slope effect. • Accurately tracking SSR temporal change requires correcting the overall slope effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2025-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2025.106618
Primary Topic
Soil erosion and sediment transport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of overall slope on soil surface roughness estimation

Soon Jiann Tan, Zhihua Zhang, Wenting Nie, Shuai Liu et al.
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil erosion and sediment transport
article

The effects of overall slope on soil surface roughness estimation

Soon Jiann Tan, Zhihua Zhang, Wenting Nie, Shuai Liu, Li Li, Yu-cheng Guo, Jianming Li, Xiaoxia Tong, Jinquan Huang
article en

Abstract

Soil surface roughness ( SSR ) is essential for understanding and modeling soil erosion processes, while whether the overall slope of the investigated terrain surface must be corrected before SSR estimation is still unknown. This study aims to investigate the effects of overall slope on SSR and associated temporal change estimates by using the high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) from the rainfall simulation experiments of Nearing et al. (2017) wherein medium-term rainfalls (ca. 10–20 years) were simulated on a 2 m by 6.1 m stony plot under three slope treatments (5 %, 12 %, and 20 %). Square moving windows with different sizes ( W Z ) covering the topographic DEMs were used to estimate SSR for each slope treatment before and after each rainfall simulation under the slope-detrending (DT) and no-detrending (NDT) scenarios. Results showed that: (1) The estimated SSR linearly increased with W Z under the NDT scenario while it increased rapidly for small W Z and tended toward asymptotes for large W Z under the DT scenario. (2) With increasing window size, the standard deviations of SSR increased under the NDT scenario but decreased under the DT scenario. (3) Without correcting the overall slope effects, SSR was overestimated while the temporal change of SSR was significantly underestimated reaching up to −175 % as compared to the DT scenario, and the underestimation was positively correlated with slope gradient, the true SSR temporal change, and window size. We mathematically illustrated that the estimated SSR under the NDT scenario in fact consisted of oriented roughness that was resultant from the systematic elevation variation rather than soil surface random roughness alone, and the overall slope effects must be corrected before SSR estimation for effectively tracking SSR temporal changes. The results provide guidance about the level of accuracy one might expect in evaluating SSR and associated temporal changes at hillslopes with different overall slopes. • Soil surface roughness (SSR) was overestimated due to the overall slope effect. • SSR temporal change was underestimated without correcting the overall slope effect. • Accurately tracking SSR temporal change requires correcting the overall slope effect.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 252
Changjiang Water Resources Commission (CN), Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Soil erosion and sediment transport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.