VALIDATION OF THE CHINESE ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY SCALE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

Recent research has explored the academic self-efficacy of students in higher education and its impact on learning engagement. In graduate learning environments, academic self-efficacy is a key motivator influencing students’ motives, educational achievement, and self-directed study ability. However, the Chinese adaption of the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale for Graduate Students (ASES-G) has not been systematically validated, which limits the development of related research to some extent. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to adapt the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) into a Chinese context and to assess its validity and reliability for graduate students in China. In this study, the original ASES was first culturally adapted and translated, and then experts were invited to assess its content validity. A two-step method was implemented to evaluate validity and reliability based on this. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis were conducted to evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the scale; thereafter, the split-half reliability was calculated to validate the scale’s stability further. This study employed IBM SPSS Statistics for statistical analysis, revealing a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.886, indicating high reliability. The findings in this study suggest that the Chinese ASES-G demonstrates good validity and reliability among Chinese graduate students, making it a valuable tool for evaluating academic self-efficacy in forthcoming higher education research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling
Published
2025-03-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35631/ijepc.1057066
Primary Topic
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

VALIDATION OF THE CHINESE ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY SCALE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

Chew Fong Peng, Teng Teng Yap, Tingting Xie
International Journal of Education Psychology and Counseling
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
article

VALIDATION OF THE CHINESE ACADEMIC SELF-EFFICACY SCALE FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

Chew Fong Peng, Teng Teng Yap, Tingting Xie
article en

Abstract

Recent research has explored the academic self-efficacy of students in higher education and its impact on learning engagement. In graduate learning environments, academic self-efficacy is a key motivator influencing students’ motives, educational achievement, and self-directed study ability. However, the Chinese adaption of the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale for Graduate Students (ASES-G) has not been systematically validated, which limits the development of related research to some extent. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to adapt the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES) into a Chinese context and to assess its validity and reliability for graduate students in China. In this study, the original ASES was first culturally adapted and translated, and then experts were invited to assess its content validity. A two-step method was implemented to evaluate validity and reliability based on this. Exploratory factor analysis and reliability analysis were conducted to evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency of the scale; thereafter, the split-half reliability was calculated to validate the scale’s stability further. This study employed IBM SPSS Statistics for statistical analysis, revealing a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.886, indicating high reliability. The findings in this study suggest that the Chinese ASES-G demonstrates good validity and reliability among Chinese graduate students, making it a valuable tool for evaluating academic self-efficacy in forthcoming higher education research.

International Journal of Education Psychology and CounselingVol. 10(57)
University of Malaya (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.