Artificial intelligence meets genomic selection: comparing deep learning and GBLUP across diverse plant datasets

To enhance the implementation of genomic selection (GS) in plant breeding, we conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of deep learning (DL) models and genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) methods across 14 real-world datasets derived from diverse plant breeding programs. We evaluated model performance by meticulously tuning hyperparameters specific to each dataset, aiming to maximize predictive accuracy and reliability. Our results demonstrated that DL models effectively captured complex, non-linear genetic patterns, frequently providing superior predictive performance compared to GBLUP, especially in smaller datasets. However, neither method consistently outperformed the other across all evaluated traits and scenarios. The analysis revealed that the success of DL models significantly depended on careful parameter optimization, reinforcing the importance of rigorous model tuning procedures. In the discussion, we emphasize the complementary nature of DL and GBLUP methods, highlighting that the choice between these models should be driven by the specific characteristics of the traits under study and the evaluation metrics prioritized in breeding programs. These insights contribute practical guidelines for selecting and optimizing genomic prediction models to achieve robust outcomes in plant breeding contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1568705
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence meets genomic selection: comparing deep learning and GBLUP across diverse plant datasets

B. González, Sofía Ramos-Pulido, Osval Antonio Montesinos-López, José Crossa et al.
12 citations
Frontiers in Genetics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
21.81
article

Artificial intelligence meets genomic selection: comparing deep learning and GBLUP across diverse plant datasets

B. González, Sofía Ramos-Pulido, Osval Antonio Montesinos-López, José Crossa, Rodomiro Octavio Ortiz, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Edgar Alejandro Guerrero-Arroyo
article en
12 citations

Abstract

To enhance the implementation of genomic selection (GS) in plant breeding, we conducted a comprehensive comparative analysis of deep learning (DL) models and genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) methods across 14 real-world datasets derived from diverse plant breeding programs. We evaluated model performance by meticulously tuning hyperparameters specific to each dataset, aiming to maximize predictive accuracy and reliability. Our results demonstrated that DL models effectively captured complex, non-linear genetic patterns, frequently providing superior predictive performance compared to GBLUP, especially in smaller datasets. However, neither method consistently outperformed the other across all evaluated traits and scenarios. The analysis revealed that the success of DL models significantly depended on careful parameter optimization, reinforcing the importance of rigorous model tuning procedures. In the discussion, we emphasize the complementary nature of DL and GBLUP methods, highlighting that the choice between these models should be driven by the specific characteristics of the traits under study and the evaluation metrics prioritized in breeding programs. These insights contribute practical guidelines for selecting and optimizing genomic prediction models to achieve robust outcomes in plant breeding contexts.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 16
Universidad de Guadalajara (MX), Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Colegio de Postgraduados (MX), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (FR), Universidad de Colima (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
21.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.