Linguistic and Paralinguistic Affective Factors in Assessing Students’ Oral Presentations

This study explored how college teachers evaluate their students’ oral presentations, the criteria they use for assessment and their overall impressions. Adopting a case study approach for this purpose, a sample comprising four English teachers from three different colleges was selected to assess both extempore speeches and group discussions of students. Key findings indicated that teachers consider, in their evaluation, both linguistic elements such as grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation, as well as the content and relevance of the topics of the presentations. They also evaluated paralinguistic features: body language, energy, passion, and sincerity of the presentation. This highlights the significance of non-verbal communication. The teacher-evaluators believe that both the linguistic and paralinguistic features of oral presentation assessment provide a more holistic evaluation approach to oral presentation. The approach ensures that various aspects of effective communication are recognized and rewarded in the assessment. Given these findings, this holistic assessment method not only fosters students' linguistic proficiency but also emphasizes the importance of non-verbal cues in effective communication, ultimately contributing to their overall presentation skills. It follows from this that clear presentations and confidence demonstrate thorough preparation and engagement with the audience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56540/jesaf.v4i1.115
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linguistic and Paralinguistic Affective Factors in Assessing Students’ Oral Presentations

R. Kalpana, Mohammed Ali Al-Khulaidi
1 links
Journal of English Studies in Arabia Felix
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Linguistic and Paralinguistic Affective Factors in Assessing Students’ Oral Presentations

R. Kalpana, Mohammed Ali Al-Khulaidi
article en

Abstract

This study explored how college teachers evaluate their students’ oral presentations, the criteria they use for assessment and their overall impressions. Adopting a case study approach for this purpose, a sample comprising four English teachers from three different colleges was selected to assess both extempore speeches and group discussions of students. Key findings indicated that teachers consider, in their evaluation, both linguistic elements such as grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation, as well as the content and relevance of the topics of the presentations. They also evaluated paralinguistic features: body language, energy, passion, and sincerity of the presentation. This highlights the significance of non-verbal communication. The teacher-evaluators believe that both the linguistic and paralinguistic features of oral presentation assessment provide a more holistic evaluation approach to oral presentation. The approach ensures that various aspects of effective communication are recognized and rewarded in the assessment. Given these findings, this holistic assessment method not only fosters students' linguistic proficiency but also emphasizes the importance of non-verbal cues in effective communication, ultimately contributing to their overall presentation skills. It follows from this that clear presentations and confidence demonstrate thorough preparation and engagement with the audience.

Journal of English Studies in Arabia FelixVol. 4(1)
PSG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED RESEARCH (IN), Ibb University (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.