Evaluating photosynthetic models and their potency in assessing plant responses to changing oxygen concentrations: a comparative analysis of An–Ca and An–Ci curves in Lolium perenne and Triticum aestivum

Accurate determination of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding how plants respond to environmental changes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) model and introduced a novel model to fit photosynthetic rates against ambient CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub>) and intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub>) curves for <i>Lolium perenne</i> and <i>Triticum aestivum</i> under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions. We observed significant discrepancies in the FvCB model's fitting capacity for <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves across different oxygen regimes, particularly in estimates of key parameters such as the maximum carboxylation rate (<i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub>), the day respiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>day</sub>), and the maximum electron transport rate for carbon assimilation (<i>J</i> <sub>A-max</sub>). Notably, under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions, the values of <i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub> and <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub> derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves using the FvCB model were 46.98%, 44.37%, 46.63%, and 37.66% lower than those from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves for <i>L. perenne</i>, and 47.10%, 44.30%, 47.03%, and 37.36% lower for <i>T. aestivum</i>, respectively. These results highlight that the FvCB model yields significantly different <i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub> and <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub> values when fitting <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> versus <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves for these two C<sub>3</sub> plants. In contrast, the novel model demonstrated superior fitting capabilities for both <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions, achieving high determination coefficients (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>≥ 0.989). Key parameters such as the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>A</i> <sub>max</sub>) and the CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point (<i>Γ</i>) in the presence of <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub>, showed no significant differences across oxygen concentrations. However, the apparent photorespiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>pa0</sub>) and photorespiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>p0</sub>) derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves consistently exceeded those from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves for both plant species. Furthermore, <i>R</i> <sub>pa0</sub> values derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves closely matched observed values, suggesting that <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves more accurately reflect the physiological state of plants, particularly for estimating photorespiratory rates. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate CO<sub>2</sub>-response curves to investigate plant photosynthesis and photorespiration under diverse environmental conditions, thereby ensuring a more accurate understanding of plant responses to changing environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1575217
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Plant responses to elevated CO2
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating photosynthetic models and their potency in assessing plant responses to changing oxygen concentrations: a comparative analysis of An–Ca and An–Ci curves in Lolium perenne and Triticum aestivum

Zi‐Piao Ye, Xiaolong Yang, Fu-Biao Wang, Zi-Wu-Yin Ye et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Plant Science
Plant responses to elevated CO2
7.00
article

Evaluating photosynthetic models and their potency in assessing plant responses to changing oxygen concentrations: a comparative analysis of An–Ca and An–Ci curves in Lolium perenne and Triticum aestivum

Zi‐Piao Ye, Xiaolong Yang, Fu-Biao Wang, Zi-Wu-Yin Ye, Shihua Duan, Hua-Jing Kang, Ting An
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Accurate determination of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding how plants respond to environmental changes. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Farquhar-von Caemmerer-Berry (FvCB) model and introduced a novel model to fit photosynthetic rates against ambient CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub>) and intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub>) curves for <i>Lolium perenne</i> and <i>Triticum aestivum</i> under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions. We observed significant discrepancies in the FvCB model's fitting capacity for <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves across different oxygen regimes, particularly in estimates of key parameters such as the maximum carboxylation rate (<i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub>), the day respiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>day</sub>), and the maximum electron transport rate for carbon assimilation (<i>J</i> <sub>A-max</sub>). Notably, under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions, the values of <i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub> and <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub> derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves using the FvCB model were 46.98%, 44.37%, 46.63%, and 37.66% lower than those from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves for <i>L. perenne</i>, and 47.10%, 44.30%, 47.03%, and 37.36% lower for <i>T. aestivum</i>, respectively. These results highlight that the FvCB model yields significantly different <i>V</i> <sub>cmax</sub> and <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub> values when fitting <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> versus <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves for these two C<sub>3</sub> plants. In contrast, the novel model demonstrated superior fitting capabilities for both <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> and <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves under 2% and 21% O<sub>2</sub> conditions, achieving high determination coefficients (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup>≥ 0.989). Key parameters such as the maximum net photosynthetic rate (<i>A</i> <sub>max</sub>) and the CO<sub>2</sub> compensation point (<i>Γ</i>) in the presence of <i>R</i> <sub>day</sub>, showed no significant differences across oxygen concentrations. However, the apparent photorespiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>pa0</sub>) and photorespiratory rate (<i>R</i> <sub>p0</sub>) derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>i</sub> curves consistently exceeded those from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves for both plant species. Furthermore, <i>R</i> <sub>pa0</sub> values derived from <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves closely matched observed values, suggesting that <i>A</i> <sub>n</sub> <i>-C</i> <sub>a</sub> curves more accurately reflect the physiological state of plants, particularly for estimating photorespiratory rates. This study underscores the importance of selecting appropriate CO<sub>2</sub>-response curves to investigate plant photosynthesis and photorespiration under diverse environmental conditions, thereby ensuring a more accurate understanding of plant responses to changing environments.

Frontiers in Plant ScienceVol. 16
Wenzhou University (CN), Jinggangshan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Nantong University (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), Guangdong Baiyun University (CN), Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Plant responses to elevated CO2
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.