Creating Life, Creating Strife? Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Extinction, and Wild Animal Welfare

Abstract Assisted Reproductive Technologies ( ART s), such as artificial insemination ( AI ) and gene editing, offer promising solutions for addressing species extinction. These techniques have the potential to preserve endangered species and even revive extinct ones. However, conservation efforts centered on preventing species extinction may overlook an equally important concern: the well-being of individual animals. Here I offer an overview of ART in species conservation, with a particular focus on de-extinction cases, and then proceed to identify and evaluate the normative assumptions underlying conservation biology. Next, I critically examine key ethical issues related to balancing individual animal welfare with species conservation goals. I claim that concerns for individual welfare may lead us to reject many ART -based de-extinction interventions and consider a potential shift in conservation priorities. Finally, I explore two potential ways ART s could support welfare-driven conservation efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10060
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating Life, Creating Strife? Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Extinction, and Wild Animal Welfare

Cátia Faria
Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
article

Creating Life, Creating Strife? Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Extinction, and Wild Animal Welfare

Cátia Faria
article en

Abstract

Abstract Assisted Reproductive Technologies ( ART s), such as artificial insemination ( AI ) and gene editing, offer promising solutions for addressing species extinction. These techniques have the potential to preserve endangered species and even revive extinct ones. However, conservation efforts centered on preventing species extinction may overlook an equally important concern: the well-being of individual animals. Here I offer an overview of ART in species conservation, with a particular focus on de-extinction cases, and then proceed to identify and evaluate the normative assumptions underlying conservation biology. Next, I critically examine key ethical issues related to balancing individual animal welfare with species conservation goals. I claim that concerns for individual welfare may lead us to reject many ART -based de-extinction interventions and consider a potential shift in conservation priorities. Finally, I explore two potential ways ART s could support welfare-driven conservation efforts.

Journal of Applied Animal Ethics ResearchVol. 7(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Creating Life, Creating Strife? Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Extinction, and Wild Animal Welfare — Cátia Faria · Journal of Applied Animal Ethics Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS