Case note on CJEU 14 November 2024, ECLI:EUC:2024:952, C-394/22 (<i>Oilchart</i>)

In Skarb v Riel (C‑47/18), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that actions aimed at verifying the existence of a creditor’s claim in insolvency proceedings are excluded from Brussels I-bis and fall within the scope of the European Insolvency Regulation, so that jurisdiction lies exclusively with the courts of the Member State where the proceedings were opened. By contrast, in Oilchart (C‑394/22), the CJEU emphasized that the legal basis of a claim is decisive, ruling that a contractual claim does not derive directly from insolvency proceedings even if it is also submitted in such proceedings. This case note examines the divergent approaches of the CJEU – contrasting its decisions with an earlier stance of the Dutch Supreme Court regarding forum selection clauses in bankruptcy – and considers the implications for the potential of conflicting decisions on claim verification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54195/eirj.22255
Primary Topic
EU Law and Policy Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Case note on CJEU 14 November 2024, ECLI:EUC:2024:952, C-394/22 (Oilchart)

Michael Veder
European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal
EU Law and Policy Analysis
article

Case note on CJEU 14 November 2024, ECLI:EUC:2024:952, C-394/22 (Oilchart)

Michael Veder
article en

Abstract

In Skarb v Riel (C‑47/18), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that actions aimed at verifying the existence of a creditor’s claim in insolvency proceedings are excluded from Brussels I-bis and fall within the scope of the European Insolvency Regulation, so that jurisdiction lies exclusively with the courts of the Member State where the proceedings were opened. By contrast, in Oilchart (C‑394/22), the CJEU emphasized that the legal basis of a claim is decisive, ruling that a contractual claim does not derive directly from insolvency proceedings even if it is also submitted in such proceedings. This case note examines the divergent approaches of the CJEU – contrasting its decisions with an earlier stance of the Dutch Supreme Court regarding forum selection clauses in bankruptcy – and considers the implications for the potential of conflicting decisions on claim verification.

European Insolvency and Restructuring Journal
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
EU Law and Policy Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.