Multi-dimensional poverty: a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review

This research reviewed studies on multi-dimensional poverty based on a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review. Using VOSviewer, a bibliometric analysis of 1513 journal publications extracted from the Scopus database was conducted to show the growth of articles over the years, the countries and journals with the greatest number of research articles, the keywords that have been widely used, and the leading themes on multi-dimensional poverty. Content co-occurrence analysis was also conducted to facilitate a systematic literature review. Four research clusters emerged as follows: “measuring multi-dimensional poverty”, “determinants of multi-dimensional poverty”, “effects of multi-dimensional poverty”, and “fighting multi-dimensional poverty”. The content analysis revealed that researchers generally relied on the Alkire-Foster methodology, and living conditions, income, education, and health significantly impacted multi-dimensional poverty. Generally, studies have established that multi-dimensional poverty negatively impacts people’s physical and mental health. Regarding the fight against multi-dimensional poverty, researchers found that farmers’ welfare improved from the ownership of resources, access to finance, and adoption of new crop varieties. The use of digital information technology was also beneficial. Based on the content co-occurrence literature review, future research directions are discussed. This is the first study to conduct a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review of multi-dimensional poverty based on computer software.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04924-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-dimensional poverty: a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review

Lungile Ntsalaze, Tamisai Chipunza
2 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
8.40
article

Multi-dimensional poverty: a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review

Lungile Ntsalaze, Tamisai Chipunza
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research reviewed studies on multi-dimensional poverty based on a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review. Using VOSviewer, a bibliometric analysis of 1513 journal publications extracted from the Scopus database was conducted to show the growth of articles over the years, the countries and journals with the greatest number of research articles, the keywords that have been widely used, and the leading themes on multi-dimensional poverty. Content co-occurrence analysis was also conducted to facilitate a systematic literature review. Four research clusters emerged as follows: “measuring multi-dimensional poverty”, “determinants of multi-dimensional poverty”, “effects of multi-dimensional poverty”, and “fighting multi-dimensional poverty”. The content analysis revealed that researchers generally relied on the Alkire-Foster methodology, and living conditions, income, education, and health significantly impacted multi-dimensional poverty. Generally, studies have established that multi-dimensional poverty negatively impacts people’s physical and mental health. Regarding the fight against multi-dimensional poverty, researchers found that farmers’ welfare improved from the ownership of resources, access to finance, and adoption of new crop varieties. The use of digital information technology was also beneficial. Based on the content co-occurrence literature review, future research directions are discussed. This is the first study to conduct a bibliometric analysis and content co-occurrence literature review of multi-dimensional poverty based on computer software.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.