The Importance of Subtleties in the Scaling of the ‘Terminal Momentum’ For Galaxy Formation Simulations

In galaxy formation simulations, it is increasingly common to represent supernovae (SNe) at finite resolution (when the Sedov-Taylor phase is unresolved) via hybrid energy-momentum coupling with some ‘terminal momentum’ (depending weakly on ambient density and metallicity) that represents unresolved work from an energy-conserving phase. Numerical implementations can ensure momentum and energy conservation of such methods, but these require that couplings depend on the surrounding gas velocity field (radial velocity <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). This raises the question of whether should also be velocity-dependent, which we explore analytically and in simulations. We show that for simple spherical models, the dependence of on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> introduces negligible corrections beyond those already imposed by energy conservation if <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . However, for SNe in some net converging flow ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), naively coupling the total momentum when a blastwave reaches the standard cooling/snowplow phase (or some effective cooling time/velocity/temperature criterion) leads to enormous and potentially pathological behaviors. We propose an alternative <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> </mml:math> -Momentum formulation which represents the differential SNe effect and show this leads to opposite behavior of in this limit. We also consider a more conservative velocity-independent formulation. Testing in numerical simulations, these directly translate to large effects on predicted star formation histories and stellar masses of massive galaxies, explaining differences between some models and motivating further study in idealized simulations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33232/001c.132375
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Importance of Subtleties in the Scaling of the ‘Terminal Momentum’ For Galaxy Formation Simulations

Philip F. Hopkins
1 citations
The Open Journal of Astrophysics
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
0.81
article

The Importance of Subtleties in the Scaling of the ‘Terminal Momentum’ For Galaxy Formation Simulations

Philip F. Hopkins
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In galaxy formation simulations, it is increasingly common to represent supernovae (SNe) at finite resolution (when the Sedov-Taylor phase is unresolved) via hybrid energy-momentum coupling with some ‘terminal momentum’ (depending weakly on ambient density and metallicity) that represents unresolved work from an energy-conserving phase. Numerical implementations can ensure momentum and energy conservation of such methods, but these require that couplings depend on the surrounding gas velocity field (radial velocity <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ). This raises the question of whether should also be velocity-dependent, which we explore analytically and in simulations. We show that for simple spherical models, the dependence of on <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> introduces negligible corrections beyond those already imposed by energy conservation if <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . However, for SNe in some net converging flow ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="prefix">⟨</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false" form="postfix">⟩</mml:mo> <mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), naively coupling the total momentum when a blastwave reaches the standard cooling/snowplow phase (or some effective cooling time/velocity/temperature criterion) leads to enormous and potentially pathological behaviors. We propose an alternative <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>Δ</mml:mi> </mml:math> -Momentum formulation which represents the differential SNe effect and show this leads to opposite behavior of in this limit. We also consider a more conservative velocity-independent formulation. Testing in numerical simulations, these directly translate to large effects on predicted star formation histories and stellar masses of massive galaxies, explaining differences between some models and motivating further study in idealized simulations.

The Open Journal of AstrophysicsVol. 8
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.