Goal-setting participation, experiencing tensions and budgetary performance: exploring the moderation role of paradox mindset

Purpose Building on Goal-Setting and Paradox Theory, this study aims to examine the role of perceived tensions and paradox mindset in the relationship between participation in budget goal setting and budgetary performance in hybrid organizations. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey among 72 budget holders working in a hospital was conducted; partial least squares structural equation modeling technique was used to assess the measurement model and to test the research hypotheses. Findings The findings reveal that participation in goal setting is negatively associated with experiencing tensions while the relationship between experiencing tensions and budgetary performance was not significant. Moreover, paradox mindset positively moderates the relationship between experiencing tensions and budgetary performance. Originality/value This study focuses on the interplay between organizational and individual responses to institutional tensions and examines the role of paradoxical thinking in a participative budget goal-setting environment in influencing budgetary performance. Given the practical and theoretical significance of this issue, this study enhances the understanding of the complex relationship between budgeting practices and human behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-11-2024-0386
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Goal-setting participation, experiencing tensions and budgetary performance: exploring the moderation role of paradox mindset

Manuela S. Macinati, Marco Giovanni Rizzo
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change
Management and Organizational Studies
article

Goal-setting participation, experiencing tensions and budgetary performance: exploring the moderation role of paradox mindset

Manuela S. Macinati, Marco Giovanni Rizzo
article en

Abstract

Purpose Building on Goal-Setting and Paradox Theory, this study aims to examine the role of perceived tensions and paradox mindset in the relationship between participation in budget goal setting and budgetary performance in hybrid organizations. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey among 72 budget holders working in a hospital was conducted; partial least squares structural equation modeling technique was used to assess the measurement model and to test the research hypotheses. Findings The findings reveal that participation in goal setting is negatively associated with experiencing tensions while the relationship between experiencing tensions and budgetary performance was not significant. Moreover, paradox mindset positively moderates the relationship between experiencing tensions and budgetary performance. Originality/value This study focuses on the interplay between organizational and individual responses to institutional tensions and examines the role of paradoxical thinking in a participative budget goal-setting environment in influencing budgetary performance. Given the practical and theoretical significance of this issue, this study enhances the understanding of the complex relationship between budgeting practices and human behavior.

Journal of Accounting & Organizational ChangeVol. 21(7)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.