Sustainable supplier selection in the textile industry using triple bottom line and SWARA-TOPSIS approaches

Sustainable supplier selection has become a critical factor for organizations striving to align their supply chains with environmental, economic, and social sustainability goals. The increasing need for sustainable practices in procurement has prompted the development of frameworks that address these dimensions effectively. This study develops a comprehensive framework for evaluating sustainable suppliers in the textile industry, integrating Triple Bottom Line (TBL) principles with SWARA and TOPSIS methods. Initially, 20 sustainability criteria were identified through a rigorous review of the literature and expert consultations. These criteria were then narrowed down to 15 key criteria based on expert evaluations using a 5-point Likert scale. The study found that the most important economic criteria were chemical quality (0.0929), price (0.0830), and delivery reliability (0.0798), while sustainability concerns were highlighted by environmental management systems (0.0798) and employee health and safety (0.0775). These findings reflect the increasing emphasis on both operational efficiency and environmental and social responsibility in supplier selection. Using TOPSIS, the suppliers were ranked based on their performance across these 15 criteria. The results revealed Supplier A (0.7555) as the most sustainable, followed by Supplier B (0.7337), while Supplier E (0.2573) ranked last due to weaker sustainability performance. These rankings highlight the significance of sustainability practices, especially in environmental and social dimensions, which are increasingly critical in the procurement decision-making process. The study provides valuable insights for procurement managers, particularly in emerging economies like Bangladesh, where SMEs dominate the textile supply chain. By using this SWARA-TOPSIS framework, companies can select suppliers that align with sustainability goals, improving both environmental performance and social responsibility. This research contributes to the field of sustainable supply chain management by offering a structured, transparent, and objective method for supplier evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01206-9
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
35.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable supplier selection in the textile industry using triple bottom line and SWARA-TOPSIS approaches

Mst. Anjuman Ara, Md. Abdus Shabur, Ahnaf Tahmid Dhrubo, Abid Hasan Rony
17 citations
Discover Sustainability
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
35.81
article

Sustainable supplier selection in the textile industry using triple bottom line and SWARA-TOPSIS approaches

Mst. Anjuman Ara, Md. Abdus Shabur, Ahnaf Tahmid Dhrubo, Abid Hasan Rony
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Sustainable supplier selection has become a critical factor for organizations striving to align their supply chains with environmental, economic, and social sustainability goals. The increasing need for sustainable practices in procurement has prompted the development of frameworks that address these dimensions effectively. This study develops a comprehensive framework for evaluating sustainable suppliers in the textile industry, integrating Triple Bottom Line (TBL) principles with SWARA and TOPSIS methods. Initially, 20 sustainability criteria were identified through a rigorous review of the literature and expert consultations. These criteria were then narrowed down to 15 key criteria based on expert evaluations using a 5-point Likert scale. The study found that the most important economic criteria were chemical quality (0.0929), price (0.0830), and delivery reliability (0.0798), while sustainability concerns were highlighted by environmental management systems (0.0798) and employee health and safety (0.0775). These findings reflect the increasing emphasis on both operational efficiency and environmental and social responsibility in supplier selection. Using TOPSIS, the suppliers were ranked based on their performance across these 15 criteria. The results revealed Supplier A (0.7555) as the most sustainable, followed by Supplier B (0.7337), while Supplier E (0.2573) ranked last due to weaker sustainability performance. These rankings highlight the significance of sustainability practices, especially in environmental and social dimensions, which are increasingly critical in the procurement decision-making process. The study provides valuable insights for procurement managers, particularly in emerging economies like Bangladesh, where SMEs dominate the textile supply chain. By using this SWARA-TOPSIS framework, companies can select suppliers that align with sustainability goals, improving both environmental performance and social responsibility. This research contributes to the field of sustainable supply chain management by offering a structured, transparent, and objective method for supplier evaluation.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 6(1)
Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD), University of Dhaka (BD)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
35.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.