Studies on Toothbrushes Contaminated by Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients and it’s Disinfection Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Toothbrushes act as reservoirs for microbial contamination and are essential for maintaining human oral hygiene. Diabetic individuals are at a higher risk of contamination due to compromised immune responses. This study evaluates bacteria contamination and the efficacy of different disinfection methods for toothbrushes used by diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional study and clinical trial were conducted among 120 participants (60 diabetic and 60 nondiabetic). Used toothbrushes were collected and divided into control and experimental groups and subjected to disinfection using 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), vinegar, and tap water. Bacterial cultures were performed using MacConkey agar and blood agar. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 21). Results: Toothbrushes used by diabetic individuals exhibited significantly higher microbial contamination than those used by non-diabetic individuals. Here the most prevalent bacterial isolates were Streptococcus mutans (60% in diabetics vs. 46.6% in non-diabetics), Staphylococcus aureus (43.8% vs. 55%), Pseudomonas spp. (78.3% vs. 38.3%), and Escherichia coli (71.6% vs. 58.3%). Among the tested disinfectants, 5% NaOCl demonstrated the highest disinfection efficacy (100%), followed by 2% CHX (85%) and vinegar (65%). Tap water failed to reduce microbial load effectively (10%). Conclusion: Toothbrushes of diabetic individuals are significantly more contaminated than those of non-diabetic individuals, increasing the risk of oral and systemic infections. Disinfection with 5% NaOCl or 2% CHX effectively reduces microbial contamination and should be recommended as routine practice. Further studies are needed to explore additional disinfection methods and their long-term efficacy. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2025; 15(1): 28-32

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Update Dental College Journal
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v15i1.80302
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Studies on Toothbrushes Contaminated by Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients and it’s Disinfection Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study

Khurshid Alam, S. M. Shahinul Islam, Shabeer Ahamed
Update Dental College Journal
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Studies on Toothbrushes Contaminated by Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients and it’s Disinfection Procedures: A Cross-Sectional Study

Khurshid Alam, S. M. Shahinul Islam, Shabeer Ahamed
article en

Abstract

Background: Toothbrushes act as reservoirs for microbial contamination and are essential for maintaining human oral hygiene. Diabetic individuals are at a higher risk of contamination due to compromised immune responses. This study evaluates bacteria contamination and the efficacy of different disinfection methods for toothbrushes used by diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Methods: A cross-sectional study and clinical trial were conducted among 120 participants (60 diabetic and 60 nondiabetic). Used toothbrushes were collected and divided into control and experimental groups and subjected to disinfection using 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), vinegar, and tap water. Bacterial cultures were performed using MacConkey agar and blood agar. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 21). Results: Toothbrushes used by diabetic individuals exhibited significantly higher microbial contamination than those used by non-diabetic individuals. Here the most prevalent bacterial isolates were Streptococcus mutans (60% in diabetics vs. 46.6% in non-diabetics), Staphylococcus aureus (43.8% vs. 55%), Pseudomonas spp. (78.3% vs. 38.3%), and Escherichia coli (71.6% vs. 58.3%). Among the tested disinfectants, 5% NaOCl demonstrated the highest disinfection efficacy (100%), followed by 2% CHX (85%) and vinegar (65%). Tap water failed to reduce microbial load effectively (10%). Conclusion: Toothbrushes of diabetic individuals are significantly more contaminated than those of non-diabetic individuals, increasing the risk of oral and systemic infections. Disinfection with 5% NaOCl or 2% CHX effectively reduces microbial contamination and should be recommended as routine practice. Further studies are needed to explore additional disinfection methods and their long-term efficacy. Update Dent. Coll. j: 2025; 15(1): 28-32

Update Dental College JournalVol. 15(1)
Rajshahi Medical College (BD), University of Rajshahi (BD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.