Are bonobos anxious when others are ignorant of a threat? Using an affect measure to assess Theory-of-Mind abilities in bonobos

Previous studies have shown that bonobos, along with other great apes, possess certain theory-of-mind (ToM) abilities, such as the ability to attribute states of knowledge and belief to others. Our study is the first to assess ToM abilities in bonobos using scratching behavior, a widely used affective measure in great apes. Subjects watched two videos; one video showed a group member ignorant of a snake threat while the other video showed a group member knowledgeable of a snake threat. The ToM hypothesis predicted greater frequency of scratching in subjects watching the ignorance video compared to subjects watching the knowledge video. Results were consistent with this prediction. All but one subject scratched more while watching the ignorance video, and subjects scratched nearly 4 times more often on average while watching the ignorance video. Small sample size prevents any strong conclusions to be reached; however, the experimental design has the potential to be used to assess the relation between affective states and ToM abilities in great apes and other species of nonhuman animals with ToM abilities in which there are reliable behavioral indexes of affective states.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psihologijske teme
Published
2025-04-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.34.1.7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are bonobos anxious when others are ignorant of a threat? Using an affect measure to assess Theory-of-Mind abilities in bonobos

Robert W. Lurz, Ali Cherry, Steven Samuel, Jaida Dent et al.
1 citations
Psihologijske teme
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
article

Are bonobos anxious when others are ignorant of a threat? Using an affect measure to assess Theory-of-Mind abilities in bonobos

Robert W. Lurz, Ali Cherry, Steven Samuel, Jaida Dent, Jared P. Taglialatela, Amanda Epping, Julia Alonso García, Jonathan Mshvelidze, Angelina Lambros
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that bonobos, along with other great apes, possess certain theory-of-mind (ToM) abilities, such as the ability to attribute states of knowledge and belief to others. Our study is the first to assess ToM abilities in bonobos using scratching behavior, a widely used affective measure in great apes. Subjects watched two videos; one video showed a group member ignorant of a snake threat while the other video showed a group member knowledgeable of a snake threat. The ToM hypothesis predicted greater frequency of scratching in subjects watching the ignorance video compared to subjects watching the knowledge video. Results were consistent with this prediction. All but one subject scratched more while watching the ignorance video, and subjects scratched nearly 4 times more often on average while watching the ignorance video. Small sample size prevents any strong conclusions to be reached; however, the experimental design has the potential to be used to assess the relation between affective states and ToM abilities in great apes and other species of nonhuman animals with ToM abilities in which there are reliable behavioral indexes of affective states.

Psihologijske temeVol. 34(1)
St George's, University of London (GB), Kennesaw State University (US), Brooklyn College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.