Techno-economic Analysis of Biomass Co-firing Application on Indonesia 660 MW Class Subcritical Coal-Fired Power Plant

Following the publication of the Ministerial of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia Decree number 14.K/TL.04/MEM.L/2023 regarding the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission cap for coal-fired power plant (CFPP), PLN, the electricity company owned by Indonesia, is attempting the GHG reduction of its CFPPs at certain levels through several decarbonization programs, with biomass co-firing on its existing CFPP as the first step. The CFPP that becomes the object of this study is 660 MW class subcritical, Suralaya units 5-7, with a net capacity of 643.09 MW per unit. The biomass used is sawdust that was taken from local suppliers. The existing power plant has a carbon emission intensity of 1.03 Ton/MWh, higher than that of the carbon cap (0.911 Ton/MWh). Therefore, it should pay a carbon tax at a certain value. The biomass co-firing implementation can reduce its intensity depending on the ratio. The biomass implementation would probably require an upgrade investment. The other cost-effect factors are fuel cost and carbon tax. The degradation of CFPP performance can impact on fuel costs. Then, the biomass co-firing implementation can reduce or even prevent a power plant from paying the carbon tax. The best option regarding the financial calculation result is a 5% ratio. It potentially reduces the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 0.36 IDR/kWh. However, a higher biomass ratio will probably increase the power plant LCOE. Implementing a higher biomass co-firing ratio does not always result in better financial aspects. The decision to implement shall consider the valid regulation comprehensively.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.16677
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biofuel production and bioconversion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-economic Analysis of Biomass Co-firing Application on Indonesia 660 MW Class Subcritical Coal-Fired Power Plant

Winny Wulandari, Muhammad Royan Alfi Rosyidin, Alfian Muhammad Reza, Hengky Setiawan et al.
1 citations
ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering
Biofuel production and bioconversion
0.67
article

Techno-economic Analysis of Biomass Co-firing Application on Indonesia 660 MW Class Subcritical Coal-Fired Power Plant

Winny Wulandari, Muhammad Royan Alfi Rosyidin, Alfian Muhammad Reza, Hengky Setiawan, Imam Hambali Supardi, Ari Hindarto
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Following the publication of the Ministerial of Energy and Mineral Resources of Indonesia Decree number 14.K/TL.04/MEM.L/2023 regarding the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission cap for coal-fired power plant (CFPP), PLN, the electricity company owned by Indonesia, is attempting the GHG reduction of its CFPPs at certain levels through several decarbonization programs, with biomass co-firing on its existing CFPP as the first step. The CFPP that becomes the object of this study is 660 MW class subcritical, Suralaya units 5-7, with a net capacity of 643.09 MW per unit. The biomass used is sawdust that was taken from local suppliers. The existing power plant has a carbon emission intensity of 1.03 Ton/MWh, higher than that of the carbon cap (0.911 Ton/MWh). Therefore, it should pay a carbon tax at a certain value. The biomass co-firing implementation can reduce its intensity depending on the ratio. The biomass implementation would probably require an upgrade investment. The other cost-effect factors are fuel cost and carbon tax. The degradation of CFPP performance can impact on fuel costs. Then, the biomass co-firing implementation can reduce or even prevent a power plant from paying the carbon tax. The best option regarding the financial calculation result is a 5% ratio. It potentially reduces the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 0.36 IDR/kWh. However, a higher biomass ratio will probably increase the power plant LCOE. Implementing a higher biomass co-firing ratio does not always result in better financial aspects. The decision to implement shall consider the valid regulation comprehensively.

ASEAN Journal of Chemical EngineeringVol. 25(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Biofuel production and bioconversion
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.