Supporting teachers' value‐sensitive reflections on the cost–benefit dynamics of technology in educational practices

Abstract This paper explores the application of a benefits versus costs reflection approach within non‐university teaching environments, grounded in the principles of Value‐Sensitive Design. Aimed at integrating human values systematically into the adoption of digital educational tools, this study involved 136 in‐service school teachers across various workshops in Catalonia. Through the use of a structured customisable worksheet, educators critically self‐evaluated their feelings about both the benefits and costs associated with the use of digital technologies in their teaching practices. The study found that the approach was meaningful to the teachers, who were able to adapt the use of the workshop to their cases. The positive reception by teachers suggests not only a satisfactory level of usability and utility of the approach but also their agreement with the need to integrate related strategies in their training, learning design and community debate processes. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The integration of digital tools in education has been widely recognised for its potential to enhance learning experiences, but it also raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Value‐Sensitive Design (VSD) has been established as a framework that systematically integrates human values into the technology design process, particularly in human‐computer interaction fields. What this paper adds This paper shows the practical application of VSD in the form of a benefits versus costs reflection approach within non‐university educational settings, providing new insights into perceived usefulness and preferences for adaptation. It illustrates how educators can use a VSD approach to critically evaluate digital tools, leading to processes of enhanced understanding and informed community debate. Implications for practice and/or policy The findings advocate for the inclusion of VSD‐based reflective practices in teacher training programs to enhance educators' ability to critically assess and integrate technology in education. Teachers value initiatives that implement reflective, participation‐oriented decision‐making strategies aiming to maximise benefits and minimise potential harms when selecting technological tools that influence the design of educational settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Educational Technology
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13592
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting teachers' value‐sensitive reflections on the cost–benefit dynamics of technology in educational practices

Davinia Hernández‐Leo, Karina Ginoyan
1 citations
British Journal of Educational Technology
Online and Blended Learning
8.93
article

Supporting teachers' value‐sensitive reflections on the cost–benefit dynamics of technology in educational practices

Davinia Hernández‐Leo, Karina Ginoyan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the application of a benefits versus costs reflection approach within non‐university teaching environments, grounded in the principles of Value‐Sensitive Design. Aimed at integrating human values systematically into the adoption of digital educational tools, this study involved 136 in‐service school teachers across various workshops in Catalonia. Through the use of a structured customisable worksheet, educators critically self‐evaluated their feelings about both the benefits and costs associated with the use of digital technologies in their teaching practices. The study found that the approach was meaningful to the teachers, who were able to adapt the use of the workshop to their cases. The positive reception by teachers suggests not only a satisfactory level of usability and utility of the approach but also their agreement with the need to integrate related strategies in their training, learning design and community debate processes. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic The integration of digital tools in education has been widely recognised for its potential to enhance learning experiences, but it also raises significant ethical and practical concerns. Value‐Sensitive Design (VSD) has been established as a framework that systematically integrates human values into the technology design process, particularly in human‐computer interaction fields. What this paper adds This paper shows the practical application of VSD in the form of a benefits versus costs reflection approach within non‐university educational settings, providing new insights into perceived usefulness and preferences for adaptation. It illustrates how educators can use a VSD approach to critically evaluate digital tools, leading to processes of enhanced understanding and informed community debate. Implications for practice and/or policy The findings advocate for the inclusion of VSD‐based reflective practices in teacher training programs to enhance educators' ability to critically assess and integrate technology in education. Teachers value initiatives that implement reflective, participation‐oriented decision‐making strategies aiming to maximise benefits and minimise potential harms when selecting technological tools that influence the design of educational settings.

British Journal of Educational TechnologyVol. 56(4)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Online and Blended Learning
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.