Policy advisory systems and crisis governance: the advisory committee architecture within different politicization settings

Purpose An Advisory Committee (AC) is a particular type of crisis governance device that provides evidence to inform government decision-making. This article explores AC architecture and how it may determine a government’s response capacity during the COVID-19 crisis by politicization settings (i.e. meritocratic vs highly politicized/patronaged). Design/methodology/approach This study compares two cases with contrasting politicization archetypes: Ireland as meritocratic and Slovakia as patronaged. A pattern-matching approach is applied in the case study design. Findings The findings illustrate how different politicization settings impacted COVID-19 crisis governance. The Irish case demonstrated hierarchical and traceable decision-making and AC membership was composed of bureaucrats and independent experts focused on evidence production. The politicized Slovak case was characterized by centralization around the prime minister, informal governance structures, circularity in decision-making procedures and unclear accountability. Research limitations/implications The study provides conceptual insights that may be deployed to interpret the impact of politicization in diverse settings. Practical implications The existing organizational capacity determines government response during a crisis and strengthening AC architecture is essential. Explicit and documented governance design is critical to accountability, transparency and societal trust. Social implications The design architecture of ACs can empower evidence production and contribute to effective governance in a meritocratic setting. In contrast, a highly politicized setting may result in promoting patronage characteristics. Originality/value This article contributes to emerging research on the system level arguing that the character of the organization of expertise conditions adoption of expert ideas. It proposes a framework for comparative analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpsm-05-2024-0172
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy advisory systems and crisis governance: the advisory committee architecture within different politicization settings

Katarína Staroňová, Bernadette Connaughton, Róbert Martin Hudec
3 citations
International Journal of Public Sector Management
Public Policy and Administration Research
10.97
article

Policy advisory systems and crisis governance: the advisory committee architecture within different politicization settings

Katarína Staroňová, Bernadette Connaughton, Róbert Martin Hudec
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose An Advisory Committee (AC) is a particular type of crisis governance device that provides evidence to inform government decision-making. This article explores AC architecture and how it may determine a government’s response capacity during the COVID-19 crisis by politicization settings (i.e. meritocratic vs highly politicized/patronaged). Design/methodology/approach This study compares two cases with contrasting politicization archetypes: Ireland as meritocratic and Slovakia as patronaged. A pattern-matching approach is applied in the case study design. Findings The findings illustrate how different politicization settings impacted COVID-19 crisis governance. The Irish case demonstrated hierarchical and traceable decision-making and AC membership was composed of bureaucrats and independent experts focused on evidence production. The politicized Slovak case was characterized by centralization around the prime minister, informal governance structures, circularity in decision-making procedures and unclear accountability. Research limitations/implications The study provides conceptual insights that may be deployed to interpret the impact of politicization in diverse settings. Practical implications The existing organizational capacity determines government response during a crisis and strengthening AC architecture is essential. Explicit and documented governance design is critical to accountability, transparency and societal trust. Social implications The design architecture of ACs can empower evidence production and contribute to effective governance in a meritocratic setting. In contrast, a highly politicized setting may result in promoting patronage characteristics. Originality/value This article contributes to emerging research on the system level arguing that the character of the organization of expertise conditions adoption of expert ideas. It proposes a framework for comparative analysis.

International Journal of Public Sector ManagementVol. 39(1)
University of Limerick (IE), Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Public Policy and Administration Research
10.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.