Using Storage Ponds in Natural Flood Management Schemes in Practice: The Need for Fine‐Tuning and Upscaling

ABSTRACT There is increasing interest in installing water storage ponds as part of natural flood management (NFM) approaches being implemented globally. Despite decades of experience with constructing flood storage ponds within civil engineering disciplines, there remains little empirical evidence of their effectiveness in NFM. In NFM, ‘natural’ ponds use green infrastructure, are often smaller but more numerous, and are built and maintained by land managers rather than engineers. Here we investigate six flood storage ponds in the 69 km 2 Eddleston NFM pilot catchment in Scotland, UK, analysing impact on peak stream flows at different scales and pond designs. The ponds generally reduce peak stream flows where they have large available capacity, catchments are small (< 1 km 2 ), and events are low magnitude (> 20% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP)). No discernible flow reduction was observed at the largest pond and catchment (64 km 2 ) for the largest (~21% AEP) event. There was significant variability between ponds, and gains can be made in engineering pond inlet/outlet structures, maintenance, and more widespread installation. The findings suggest that natural storage ponds have most potential to contribute to flood control in small catchments (< 10 km 2 ) and small flood events (> 25% AEP), when they are carefully designed and maintained, and sufficient in number.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.70059
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Storage Ponds in Natural Flood Management Schemes in Practice: The Need for Fine‐Tuning and Upscaling

Alan MacDonald, Andrew Black, Matthew Iain Arran, Leo Peskett et al.
2 citations
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
article

Using Storage Ponds in Natural Flood Management Schemes in Practice: The Need for Fine‐Tuning and Upscaling

Alan MacDonald, Andrew Black, Matthew Iain Arran, Leo Peskett, Sarah L. Collins, Andy Young
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT There is increasing interest in installing water storage ponds as part of natural flood management (NFM) approaches being implemented globally. Despite decades of experience with constructing flood storage ponds within civil engineering disciplines, there remains little empirical evidence of their effectiveness in NFM. In NFM, ‘natural’ ponds use green infrastructure, are often smaller but more numerous, and are built and maintained by land managers rather than engineers. Here we investigate six flood storage ponds in the 69 km 2 Eddleston NFM pilot catchment in Scotland, UK, analysing impact on peak stream flows at different scales and pond designs. The ponds generally reduce peak stream flows where they have large available capacity, catchments are small (< 1 km 2 ), and events are low magnitude (> 20% Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP)). No discernible flow reduction was observed at the largest pond and catchment (64 km 2 ) for the largest (~21% AEP) event. There was significant variability between ponds, and gains can be made in engineering pond inlet/outlet structures, maintenance, and more widespread installation. The findings suggest that natural storage ponds have most potential to contribute to flood control in small catchments (< 10 km 2 ) and small flood events (> 25% AEP), when they are carefully designed and maintained, and sufficient in number.

Journal of Flood Risk ManagementVol. 18(2)
British Geological Survey (GB), University of Dundee (GB), HR Wallingford (GB), Heriot-Watt University (GB)
University of Dundee, Scottish Government, UK Research and Innovation, British Geological Survey
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.