Pedagogical framework for hybrid intelligent feedback

Generative AI (GenAI) has gained attention as a new feedback source in education because it can generate human-like text. However, its use in feedback lacks a strong pedagogical framework, which is necessary for effective implementation. This paper addresses this gap. It outlines human-centered feedback challenges, and then explores human and artificial cognition differences, highlighting the need for hybrid intelligence. Next, it positions GenAI feedback within feedback theory and proposes a definition for GenAI feedback. The paper conceptualizes the role of GenAI feedback as either an independent source or as part of a collaborative process with humans referred to as “Hybrid Intelligent Feedback”. Building on this conceptualization, it discusses the approaches and principles of hybrid intelligent feedback and then proposes a pedagogical framework that outlines the implementation steps for hybrid intelligent feedback. The paper concludes by describing the pedagogical framework and outlining recommendations for future research on hybrid intelligent feedback.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2025.2499174
Citations
25
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
62.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical framework for hybrid intelligent feedback

Hassan Khosravi, Christian Dieter Schunn, Hendrik Drachsler, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem et al.
25 citations
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
62.02
article

Pedagogical framework for hybrid intelligent feedback

Hassan Khosravi, Christian Dieter Schunn, Hendrik Drachsler, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, Omid Noroozi
article en
25 citations

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) has gained attention as a new feedback source in education because it can generate human-like text. However, its use in feedback lacks a strong pedagogical framework, which is necessary for effective implementation. This paper addresses this gap. It outlines human-centered feedback challenges, and then explores human and artificial cognition differences, highlighting the need for hybrid intelligence. Next, it positions GenAI feedback within feedback theory and proposes a definition for GenAI feedback. The paper conceptualizes the role of GenAI feedback as either an independent source or as part of a collaborative process with humans referred to as “Hybrid Intelligent Feedback”. Building on this conceptualization, it discusses the approaches and principles of hybrid intelligent feedback and then proposes a pedagogical framework that outlines the implementation steps for hybrid intelligent feedback. The paper concludes by describing the pedagogical framework and outlining recommendations for future research on hybrid intelligent feedback.

Innovations in Education and Teaching InternationalVol. 63(2)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Pittsburgh (US), Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
62.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.