The Pandemic Grief Scale and Pandemic Grief Risk Factors

Abstract: Introduction: The unique circumstances surrounding grief experienced during the pandemic created a need to develop specific tools to assess these processes. Two instruments have been developed and validated in English: the Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS) and the Pandemic Grief Risk Factors (PGRF). Aim: The present study validated the Spanish versions of both scales and explored their relation to Prolonged Grief Disorder symptomatology in the months following the attenuation of the pandemic in the West. Method: The sample consisted of 276 Spanish bereaved people who had lost a loved one during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other instruments, including the PG-13, were used alongside the PGS and PGRF to establish diagnostic criteria. The Support Needs Questionnaire and SCL-90-R were also employed to provide evidence of convergent and divergent validity. Results: Both scales had a unifactorial structure and adequate reliability indices (α = .85–.86). A cutoff point of 7 on the PGS identified mourners with prolonged grief disorder with high sensitivity and specificity. Further validity analyses showed positive correlations of dysfunctional grief with psychopathological variables. Conclusion: The Spanish versions of the PGS and PGRF demonstrate adequate psychometric properties for assessing the longer-term complications of COVID-19 loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychology Open
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000082
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Pandemic Grief Scale and Pandemic Grief Risk Factors

Manuel Fernández‐Alcántara, María Nieves Pérez‐Marfil, María José Cabañero‐Martínez, Francisco Cruz‐Quintana et al.
European Journal of Psychology Open
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

The Pandemic Grief Scale and Pandemic Grief Risk Factors

Manuel Fernández‐Alcántara, María Nieves Pérez‐Marfil, María José Cabañero‐Martínez, Francisco Cruz‐Quintana, Robert A. Neimeyer, Andrea Redondo-Armenteros
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The unique circumstances surrounding grief experienced during the pandemic created a need to develop specific tools to assess these processes. Two instruments have been developed and validated in English: the Pandemic Grief Scale (PGS) and the Pandemic Grief Risk Factors (PGRF). Aim: The present study validated the Spanish versions of both scales and explored their relation to Prolonged Grief Disorder symptomatology in the months following the attenuation of the pandemic in the West. Method: The sample consisted of 276 Spanish bereaved people who had lost a loved one during the COVID-19 pandemic. Other instruments, including the PG-13, were used alongside the PGS and PGRF to establish diagnostic criteria. The Support Needs Questionnaire and SCL-90-R were also employed to provide evidence of convergent and divergent validity. Results: Both scales had a unifactorial structure and adequate reliability indices (α = .85–.86). A cutoff point of 7 on the PGS identified mourners with prolonged grief disorder with high sensitivity and specificity. Further validity analyses showed positive correlations of dysfunctional grief with psychopathological variables. Conclusion: The Spanish versions of the PGS and PGRF demonstrate adequate psychometric properties for assessing the longer-term complications of COVID-19 loss.

European Journal of Psychology OpenVol. 84(4)
Edison Welding Institute (US), University of Alicante (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.