Trump and the US energy transition

Abstract The US electricity grid has seen a rapid increase in the amount of renewable energy over the last decade, with many renewable advocates viewing the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 as the catalyst to move the grid towards 100% clean energy. The 2024 elections, however, have significantly muddied the path. In this commentary, I posit what the Trump administration—and related Republican control of both houses of the US Congress—means for the US electricity system. I begin by briefly outlining the contours of federal and state electricity governance, the design of Inflation Reduction Act, the existing drivers of renewable energy growth in the United States, and the potential for electricity demand growth in the United States. I continue by briefly pointing to likely outcomes for the predominant fossil fuels on the grid—natural gas and coal—before pointing to the potential for continuing growth in renewable energy. In the conclusion, I argue that while renewable energy will not cease to be developed, four years of Trump increases the certainty that the clean energy transition will continue to be patchy and, sadly, all too slow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geographical Journal
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.70009
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trump and the US energy transition

Conor Harrison
4 citations
Geographical Journal
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
1.45
article

Trump and the US energy transition

Conor Harrison
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract The US electricity grid has seen a rapid increase in the amount of renewable energy over the last decade, with many renewable advocates viewing the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 as the catalyst to move the grid towards 100% clean energy. The 2024 elections, however, have significantly muddied the path. In this commentary, I posit what the Trump administration—and related Republican control of both houses of the US Congress—means for the US electricity system. I begin by briefly outlining the contours of federal and state electricity governance, the design of Inflation Reduction Act, the existing drivers of renewable energy growth in the United States, and the potential for electricity demand growth in the United States. I continue by briefly pointing to likely outcomes for the predominant fossil fuels on the grid—natural gas and coal—before pointing to the potential for continuing growth in renewable energy. In the conclusion, I argue that while renewable energy will not cease to be developed, four years of Trump increases the certainty that the clean energy transition will continue to be patchy and, sadly, all too slow.

Geographical JournalVol. 191(4)
University of South Carolina (US)
Johns Hopkins University
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Global Energy and Sustainability Research
1.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.