Understanding, communicating, and imagining urban biodiversity in German and Italian cities

Abstract Urban biodiversity has recently emerged as a key focus in urban planning discourse and is the cornerstone of the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030. This strategy proposes ambitious urban greening plans for cities with over 20,000 inhabitants to address urban biodiversity holistically. In their way of developing urban biodiversity-based imaginaries, future uncertainties, complex terminology, and data attainability hinder the efforts of small to large cities in addressing urban biodiversity satisfactorily. Based on comparative case studies of Heidelberg, Hanover, Cesena, and Florence, we developed explorative research that sources from urban, social, and political science methods that investigate the complexity of urban biodiversity between past experiences, present discourses, and future imaginaries. By analysing policy documents, urban actors’ discourses, and the physical manifestation of the UGPs in these four cities, we argue that size does not matter. Instead, cultural and communication gaps should be addressed behind an underdeveloped and superficial public debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Climate Action
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00249-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding, communicating, and imagining urban biodiversity in German and Italian cities

Melanie Nagel, Alessandro Arlati
1 citations
npj Climate Action
Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
2.31
article

Understanding, communicating, and imagining urban biodiversity in German and Italian cities

Melanie Nagel, Alessandro Arlati
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Urban biodiversity has recently emerged as a key focus in urban planning discourse and is the cornerstone of the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030. This strategy proposes ambitious urban greening plans for cities with over 20,000 inhabitants to address urban biodiversity holistically. In their way of developing urban biodiversity-based imaginaries, future uncertainties, complex terminology, and data attainability hinder the efforts of small to large cities in addressing urban biodiversity satisfactorily. Based on comparative case studies of Heidelberg, Hanover, Cesena, and Florence, we developed explorative research that sources from urban, social, and political science methods that investigate the complexity of urban biodiversity between past experiences, present discourses, and future imaginaries. By analysing policy documents, urban actors’ discourses, and the physical manifestation of the UGPs in these four cities, we argue that size does not matter. Instead, cultural and communication gaps should be addressed behind an underdeveloped and superficial public debate.

npj Climate ActionVol. 4(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), HafenCity University Hamburg (DE), Heidelberg Engineering (Germany) (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), Heidelberg University (US)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.