Performance Evaluation of Fixed-Point Continuous Monitoring Systems: Influence of Averaging Time in Complex Emission Environments

Quantifying methane emissions from facilities with complex emissions profiles can present a substantial challenge. Real-world emission scenarios can involve dynamic operational background emissions and temporally overlapping asynchronous emission events with varying rates from multiple sources. Previous studies have involved simpler testing setups, often with synchronous emission sources and constant rates. This work is among the first to assess the performance of continuous monitoring systems (CMSs) under dynamic, overlapping emission scenarios with time-varying baselines. The data were collected as part of a novel single-blind controlled release study, where release sources and emission rates are not disclosed during the testing period. Several error metrics are defined and evaluated across a range of relevant averaging times, demonstrating that despite significant error variance in short-duration estimates, the low bias of the system results in substantially improved emission estimates when aggregated to longer timescales. Over the 4-week duration of this study, 700 kg of methane was released by the testing center, while the estimated quantity shows a final mass of 673 kg, an underestimation by 27 kg (4%). These results demonstrate that advanced CMSs can accurately quantify cumulative site-level emissions in complex scenarios, highlighting their potential for enhanced future emissions monitoring and regulatory applications in the oil and gas sector.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s25092801
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation of Fixed-Point Continuous Monitoring Systems: Influence of Averaging Time in Complex Emission Environments

David J. Ball, Ali Lashgari, Nathan Eichenlaub
4 citations
Sensors
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
article

Performance Evaluation of Fixed-Point Continuous Monitoring Systems: Influence of Averaging Time in Complex Emission Environments

David J. Ball, Ali Lashgari, Nathan Eichenlaub
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Quantifying methane emissions from facilities with complex emissions profiles can present a substantial challenge. Real-world emission scenarios can involve dynamic operational background emissions and temporally overlapping asynchronous emission events with varying rates from multiple sources. Previous studies have involved simpler testing setups, often with synchronous emission sources and constant rates. This work is among the first to assess the performance of continuous monitoring systems (CMSs) under dynamic, overlapping emission scenarios with time-varying baselines. The data were collected as part of a novel single-blind controlled release study, where release sources and emission rates are not disclosed during the testing period. Several error metrics are defined and evaluated across a range of relevant averaging times, demonstrating that despite significant error variance in short-duration estimates, the low bias of the system results in substantially improved emission estimates when aggregated to longer timescales. Over the 4-week duration of this study, 700 kg of methane was released by the testing center, while the estimated quantity shows a final mass of 673 kg, an underestimation by 27 kg (4%). These results demonstrate that advanced CMSs can accurately quantify cumulative site-level emissions in complex scenarios, highlighting their potential for enhanced future emissions monitoring and regulatory applications in the oil and gas sector.

SensorsVol. 25(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.