Mobilizing Discord on the United States’ Many Borders: Critical Social Science and Geopolitical Complexity

Attention to the political landscape connecting the United States, Mexico, and Central America has returned with glaring intensity, highlighting the visibly geostrategic elements of bordering practice. Scholars have focused on how state power materializes at multiple scales while at the same time being attentive to the contestable and mutable nature of myriad agentic forces. This talk operates similarly by considering prospects for a frictional and at times ambiguous spatial politics. I extend the notion of discord as a productive lens through which to consider securitization, mobility, and migration. I use two short examples—the border-industrial complex and migrant caravans—to illustrate my theoretical concept. Discordance—replete with disagreement, cacophony, and complementarity—disrupts conformist tendencies to analyze mobilities as mere effects of larger systems that unfold coherently, asking us to instead hold possibility and peril together. Dwelling in the frictions of discord directs attention to sites and processes not previously legible as political.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Midwest Social Sciences Journal
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22543/2766-0796.1183
Primary Topic
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobilizing Discord on the United States’ Many Borders: Critical Social Science and Geopolitical Complexity

Margath A. Walker
Midwest Social Sciences Journal
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
article

Mobilizing Discord on the United States’ Many Borders: Critical Social Science and Geopolitical Complexity

Margath A. Walker
article en

Abstract

Attention to the political landscape connecting the United States, Mexico, and Central America has returned with glaring intensity, highlighting the visibly geostrategic elements of bordering practice. Scholars have focused on how state power materializes at multiple scales while at the same time being attentive to the contestable and mutable nature of myriad agentic forces. This talk operates similarly by considering prospects for a frictional and at times ambiguous spatial politics. I extend the notion of discord as a productive lens through which to consider securitization, mobility, and migration. I use two short examples—the border-industrial complex and migrant caravans—to illustrate my theoretical concept. Discordance—replete with disagreement, cacophony, and complementarity—disrupts conformist tendencies to analyze mobilities as mere effects of larger systems that unfold coherently, asking us to instead hold possibility and peril together. Dwelling in the frictions of discord directs attention to sites and processes not previously legible as political.

Midwest Social Sciences JournalVol. 27(2)
University of Louisville Hospital (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Elite Sociology and Global Capitalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.