Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education: A Work-in-Progress Systematic Review of Applications and Challenges

This Work-in-Progress (WIP) study systematically reviews the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in engineering education.Through analysis of 216 studies, we examine AI's potential to enhance engagement, conceptual understanding, and skill development in foundational engineering courses.Using a theoretical framework that integrates Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), Self-Efficacy Theory (SET), and Situated Learning Theory (SLT), we analyze implementation strategies, outcomes, and barriers across diverse institutional contexts.Metaanalyses indicate that AI-enhanced active learning approaches can increase student performance by 0.47 standard deviations and reduce failure rates by up to 55% compared to traditional methods (Freeman et al., 2014).However, challenges including high implementation costs, insufficient faculty training, and inequitable access persist.This study provides evidence-based recommendations for sustainable AI integration in engineering education, supported by comprehensive case studies and detailed implementation frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--55058
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education: A Work-in-Progress Systematic Review of Applications and Challenges

Thomas F. Hallmark
1 citations
Engineering Education and Technology
3.25
article

Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education: A Work-in-Progress Systematic Review of Applications and Challenges

Thomas F. Hallmark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This Work-in-Progress (WIP) study systematically reviews the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in engineering education.Through analysis of 216 studies, we examine AI's potential to enhance engagement, conceptual understanding, and skill development in foundational engineering courses.Using a theoretical framework that integrates Cognitive Load Theory (CLT), Self-Efficacy Theory (SET), and Situated Learning Theory (SLT), we analyze implementation strategies, outcomes, and barriers across diverse institutional contexts.Metaanalyses indicate that AI-enhanced active learning approaches can increase student performance by 0.47 standard deviations and reduce failure rates by up to 55% compared to traditional methods (Freeman et al., 2014).However, challenges including high implementation costs, insufficient faculty training, and inequitable access persist.This study provides evidence-based recommendations for sustainable AI integration in engineering education, supported by comprehensive case studies and detailed implementation frameworks.

Mitchell Institute (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Engineering Education and Technology
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Education: A Work-in-Progress Systematic Review of Applications and Challenges — Thomas F. Hallmark · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS