Various Definitions of a Planet

The term planet currently does not have a unanimous agreement upon definition. The most widely accepted criteria proposed by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in 2006 are not undisputable. Perhaps the most controversial topic is the idea of determining the planetary status of an object not only by its own physical properties like mass or roundness, but also by its orbital properties, such as the type of its orbital parent and the object gravitational dominance. It is also difficult to draw the exact boundaries of all these properties. Another issue is developing a definition that is universal and useful, and that can be further developed for objects that have not yet been discovered or for which there is only a limited amount of data available, such as some Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) or extrasolar bodies. In the wake of an era of discovery when new Solar System objects and exoplanets are being detected, it may be beneficial or even necessary to reconsider and possibly redefine what exactly a planet is. Abstract Published by the Jagiellonian University 2025 authors

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.18.3-a2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Various Definitions of a Planet

F.G. Wrona
1 citations
Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
1.15
article

Various Definitions of a Planet

F.G. Wrona
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The term planet currently does not have a unanimous agreement upon definition. The most widely accepted criteria proposed by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in 2006 are not undisputable. Perhaps the most controversial topic is the idea of determining the planetary status of an object not only by its own physical properties like mass or roundness, but also by its orbital properties, such as the type of its orbital parent and the object gravitational dominance. It is also difficult to draw the exact boundaries of all these properties. Another issue is developing a definition that is universal and useful, and that can be further developed for objects that have not yet been discovered or for which there is only a limited amount of data available, such as some Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) or extrasolar bodies. In the wake of an era of discovery when new Solar System objects and exoplanets are being detected, it may be beneficial or even necessary to reconsider and possibly redefine what exactly a planet is. Abstract Published by the Jagiellonian University 2025 authors

Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings SupplementVol. 18(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.