Bridging social and ecological science to create spatially explicit models of human-caused mortality of carnivores

Research indicates that human-caused mortality (HCM) is a key factor limiting numerous large carnivore populations. However, efforts to represent HCM in spatially explicit models have generally been limited in scope-often relying on proxies, such as road or human density. Yet such efforts fail to distinguish different sources of HCM, which can arise from different antecedent processes. We offer a systems-based conceptual framework for understanding the antecedents of HCMs that is grounded in theory from the social and behavioral sciences. Specifically, we first explain how HCMs are usefully distinguished into four types (e.g., accidental, harvest, illicit, control actions), then discuss how these different types tend to be driven by different sets of psychological and sociopolitical processes. We contend that improvements in understanding the spatial variation in HCMs would rise from more explicit attention to the various antecedent processes that precede each mortality type.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02165-1
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging social and ecological science to create spatially explicit models of human-caused mortality of carnivores

John A. Vucetich, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, L. Mark Elbroch, Joseph W. Hinton et al.
3 citations
AMBIO
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
article

Bridging social and ecological science to create spatially explicit models of human-caused mortality of carnivores

John A. Vucetich, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, L. Mark Elbroch, Joseph W. Hinton, Neil Carter, Richard E. W. Berl, Jazmin Murphy
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Research indicates that human-caused mortality (HCM) is a key factor limiting numerous large carnivore populations. However, efforts to represent HCM in spatially explicit models have generally been limited in scope-often relying on proxies, such as road or human density. Yet such efforts fail to distinguish different sources of HCM, which can arise from different antecedent processes. We offer a systems-based conceptual framework for understanding the antecedents of HCMs that is grounded in theory from the social and behavioral sciences. Specifically, we first explain how HCMs are usefully distinguished into four types (e.g., accidental, harvest, illicit, control actions), then discuss how these different types tend to be driven by different sets of psychological and sociopolitical processes. We contend that improvements in understanding the spatial variation in HCMs would rise from more explicit attention to the various antecedent processes that precede each mortality type.

AMBIOVol. 54(9)
Michigan Technological University (US), New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (US), Panthera Corporation (US), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of Michigan (US), Ecological Consulting (Czechia) (CZ), The Ohio State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Animal Welfare Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
5.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging social and ecological science to create spatially explicit models of human-caused mortality of carnivores — John A. Vucetich, Jeremy T. Bruskotter, et al. · AMBIO (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS