Concordance between the Noose and Boomerang Items of the Boston Naming Test in an Adult Clinical Sample
Spontaneous response to the noose and boomerang items showed lack of concordance in 22.3% of patients, and the items showed differences in time to response and benefit from phonemic cuing. These findings raise concern about using the boomerang as a replacement for the noose item.
Authors
- Anna C. Graefe
- Jared B Hammond (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6130-9990)
- Grant G Moncrief (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5811-4308)
- Robert M. Roth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-6569)
- Mike Almasri
- Maurissa Abecassis
- Angela R Waszkiewicz
Institutions
- Dartmouth College (US)
- White River Junction VA Medical Center (US)
- Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center (US)
- Dartmouth Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
- Published
- 2025-04-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf031
- Primary Topic
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00