Using Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Media Narratives of Propaganda: A Comparative Analysis of Nazi Germany and the 2022 Russia–Ukraine Conflict

The media narratives that emerge from conflict reporting are often discredited or accused of carrying the propaganda of the warring front with which each narrative aligns. The digital and social media ecosystem accentuates manifold the far-reaching effects of these narratives on the personal, behavioural and environmental determinants of individuals and communities. The embedded propaganda within these narratives can be critically analysed using social cognitive theory (SCT) as the conceptual framework for two very different sets of conflict, one during the Second World War and the other in the present. The Nazi propaganda of antisemitism and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, though separated by almost eight decades, lay bare certain traits of narratives that can be critically understood using Bandura’s SCT. This article will examine Nazi propaganda mechanisms and the speeches of Hitler and Goebbels using triadic reciprocal determinism (TRD), which is one of the core tenets of Bandura’s SCT. Alongside, this article will also use TRD to examine news articles published in four Western media outlets such as Der Spiegel (in Germany), Le Monde (in France), The New York Times (NYT) (in the United States) and The Guardian (in the United Kingdom), and compare and contrast the emerging narratives with those that emerge from the most prominent Russian news agency, TASS. The article will examine selected news articles and agency news reports published over the past year since the conflict began in February 2022. While radio and print (the legacy media) and films were the tools of Nazi propaganda, media propaganda in the Russia–Ukraine conflict has also, with it, the unbounded digital media and the social media ecosystem. Using SCT, this article evaluates how media narratives of conflict (both past and present) serve as a learning model for consumers of a particular narrative, enabling them to undergo psychosocial mechanisms through which the media narrative influences their behaviour, thoughts and actions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media Watch
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09760911251335623
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Media Narratives of Propaganda: A Comparative Analysis of Nazi Germany and the 2022 Russia–Ukraine Conflict

Arjun Chatterjee
Media Watch
Media Influence and Politics
article

Using Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Media Narratives of Propaganda: A Comparative Analysis of Nazi Germany and the 2022 Russia–Ukraine Conflict

Arjun Chatterjee
article en

Abstract

The media narratives that emerge from conflict reporting are often discredited or accused of carrying the propaganda of the warring front with which each narrative aligns. The digital and social media ecosystem accentuates manifold the far-reaching effects of these narratives on the personal, behavioural and environmental determinants of individuals and communities. The embedded propaganda within these narratives can be critically analysed using social cognitive theory (SCT) as the conceptual framework for two very different sets of conflict, one during the Second World War and the other in the present. The Nazi propaganda of antisemitism and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, though separated by almost eight decades, lay bare certain traits of narratives that can be critically understood using Bandura’s SCT. This article will examine Nazi propaganda mechanisms and the speeches of Hitler and Goebbels using triadic reciprocal determinism (TRD), which is one of the core tenets of Bandura’s SCT. Alongside, this article will also use TRD to examine news articles published in four Western media outlets such as Der Spiegel (in Germany), Le Monde (in France), The New York Times (NYT) (in the United States) and The Guardian (in the United Kingdom), and compare and contrast the emerging narratives with those that emerge from the most prominent Russian news agency, TASS. The article will examine selected news articles and agency news reports published over the past year since the conflict began in February 2022. While radio and print (the legacy media) and films were the tools of Nazi propaganda, media propaganda in the Russia–Ukraine conflict has also, with it, the unbounded digital media and the social media ecosystem. Using SCT, this article evaluates how media narratives of conflict (both past and present) serve as a learning model for consumers of a particular narrative, enabling them to undergo psychosocial mechanisms through which the media narrative influences their behaviour, thoughts and actions.

Media WatchVol. 16(3)
Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Media Influence and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using Social Cognitive Theory to Explain Media Narratives of Propaganda: A Comparative Analysis of Nazi Germany and the 2022 Russia–Ukraine Conflict — Arjun Chatterjee · Media Watch (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS