Mosse on Winckelmann and masculinity

The theories of Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717-1768), known as the founder of art history and classical archaeology as academic disciplines, were of great importance for later generations’ understanding of ancient art. His expertise in classical archaeology was respected even by those who criticized his theories. This image was not significantly changed until the middle of the twentieth century, when his ideas about ancient art came under stronger attack. In this article, I will take a closer look at some of the last century’s criticism of Winckelmann, particularly that of George L. Mosse (1918-1999). In his book The Image of Man, Mosse argued that Winckelmann’s aesthetics focused on a body ideal that was exclusively male and European, precluding images of women and non-Europeans. In this way, Winckelmann created a masculine stereotype that regarded the European (especially the German) as the heir of the ancient Greek. This view, Mosse claimed, was later incorporated into the Nazis’ racial theories. By pointing out the biases in Mosse’s interpretation, I will, through a close reading of key texts and a closer look at the Winckelmann reception at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries, propose an alternative view, which shows the importance of the feminine and androgynous in Winckelmann’s aesthetics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/acta.10478
Primary Topic
Sociology and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mosse on Winckelmann and masculinity

Lasse Hodne
Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia
Sociology and Education Studies
article

Mosse on Winckelmann and masculinity

Lasse Hodne
article en

Abstract

The theories of Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717-1768), known as the founder of art history and classical archaeology as academic disciplines, were of great importance for later generations’ understanding of ancient art. His expertise in classical archaeology was respected even by those who criticized his theories. This image was not significantly changed until the middle of the twentieth century, when his ideas about ancient art came under stronger attack. In this article, I will take a closer look at some of the last century’s criticism of Winckelmann, particularly that of George L. Mosse (1918-1999). In his book The Image of Man, Mosse argued that Winckelmann’s aesthetics focused on a body ideal that was exclusively male and European, precluding images of women and non-Europeans. In this way, Winckelmann created a masculine stereotype that regarded the European (especially the German) as the heir of the ancient Greek. This view, Mosse claimed, was later incorporated into the Nazis’ racial theories. By pointing out the biases in Mosse’s interpretation, I will, through a close reading of key texts and a closer look at the Winckelmann reception at the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth centuries, propose an alternative view, which shows the importance of the feminine and androgynous in Winckelmann’s aesthetics.

Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentiaVol. 37(24 N.S.)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Sociology and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.