The Economic Implications of Phasing Out Pig Tail Docking: A Pilot Study in Italy

The European Commission's ban on routine tail docking has prompted this retrospective observational study to evaluate the short-term effects of transitioning to a fully undocked system. Twenty-two farms were assessed during three subsequent phases: total tail docking (step 1), subgroups of undocked pigs (step 2), and fully undocked pigs (step 3). Farmers received training in long-tail management and independently implemented it on their own farms. However, straw provision as environmental enrichment was mandatory, at least supplied during periods of pigs' restlessness. Overall, going through step 2 appears to be successful. However, transitioning to step 3 worsened mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and the feed conversion ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.015) in weaners. Compared to step 1, the cost of producing 1 kg of meat in step 3 was 33.9% greater during weaning and 7.4% during fattening. Tail lesion prevalence at slaughter was greater in step 3 (41%), followed by step 2 (10%) and step 1 (1%). The hypothetical labour required to optimize straw management compared to the adopted system, ensuring its continuous availability, was estimated as 35 min/100 piglets/weaning cycle (EUR 4.37) and 10.5 h/100 pigs/fattening cycle (EUR 109). Under the conditions of this study, transitioning to a fully undocked system was not successful. Mandating only the non-continuous use of straw has proven insufficient, and greater efforts must be systematically implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15091250
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.06

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Economic Implications of Phasing Out Pig Tail Docking: A Pilot Study in Italy

Giuseppe Ru, Guido Di Martino, Annalisa Scollo, Francesca Menegon et al.
3 citations
Animals
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
7.06
article

The Economic Implications of Phasing Out Pig Tail Docking: A Pilot Study in Italy

Giuseppe Ru, Guido Di Martino, Annalisa Scollo, Francesca Menegon, Samuele Trestini, Rachele Urbani
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The European Commission's ban on routine tail docking has prompted this retrospective observational study to evaluate the short-term effects of transitioning to a fully undocked system. Twenty-two farms were assessed during three subsequent phases: total tail docking (step 1), subgroups of undocked pigs (step 2), and fully undocked pigs (step 3). Farmers received training in long-tail management and independently implemented it on their own farms. However, straw provision as environmental enrichment was mandatory, at least supplied during periods of pigs' restlessness. Overall, going through step 2 appears to be successful. However, transitioning to step 3 worsened mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and the feed conversion ratio (<i>p</i> = 0.015) in weaners. Compared to step 1, the cost of producing 1 kg of meat in step 3 was 33.9% greater during weaning and 7.4% during fattening. Tail lesion prevalence at slaughter was greater in step 3 (41%), followed by step 2 (10%) and step 1 (1%). The hypothetical labour required to optimize straw management compared to the adopted system, ensuring its continuous availability, was estimated as 35 min/100 piglets/weaning cycle (EUR 4.37) and 10.5 h/100 pigs/fattening cycle (EUR 109). Under the conditions of this study, transitioning to a fully undocked system was not successful. Mandating only the non-continuous use of straw has proven insufficient, and greater efforts must be systematically implemented.

AnimalsVol. 15(9)
University of Padua (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IT), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Ministero della Salute
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
7.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.