The Romans who didn't build: Crassus, Cicero, and Marcus Aurelius' architectural legacy, or lack thereof

Throughout the Republican and Imperial eras, Rome’s leaders patronised the construction of public buildings and infrastructure projects. Doing so could bring prestige, popularity, and present and posthumous fame. However, there are also several notable Romans who were markedly more restrained than their peers in this activity. Given the acknowledged advantages of this form of civic munificence, this paper asks why certain individuals did not engage in it. Focusing on the city of Rome, it considers the building activity of Marcus Licinius Crassus, Marcus Tullius Cicero, and the emperor Marcus Aurelius. Each presents a distinct standalone case, thus providing new insights into this element of their individual biographies. Taken collectively, the discussion adds to our picture of attitudes toward building and architecture in Roman society overall, further illuminating that its perceived role within politics, society, and culture was of variable value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5617/acta.10482
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Romans who didn't build: Crassus, Cicero, and Marcus Aurelius' architectural legacy, or lack thereof

Christopher Siwicki
Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentia
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

The Romans who didn't build: Crassus, Cicero, and Marcus Aurelius' architectural legacy, or lack thereof

Christopher Siwicki
article en

Abstract

Throughout the Republican and Imperial eras, Rome’s leaders patronised the construction of public buildings and infrastructure projects. Doing so could bring prestige, popularity, and present and posthumous fame. However, there are also several notable Romans who were markedly more restrained than their peers in this activity. Given the acknowledged advantages of this form of civic munificence, this paper asks why certain individuals did not engage in it. Focusing on the city of Rome, it considers the building activity of Marcus Licinius Crassus, Marcus Tullius Cicero, and the emperor Marcus Aurelius. Each presents a distinct standalone case, thus providing new insights into this element of their individual biographies. Taken collectively, the discussion adds to our picture of attitudes toward building and architecture in Roman society overall, further illuminating that its perceived role within politics, society, and culture was of variable value.

Acta ad archaeologiam et artium historiam pertinentiaVol. 37(24 N.S.)
British School at Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.