The Impact of Non-Invasive Scores and Hemogram-Derived Ratios in Differentiating Chronic Liver Disease from Cirrhosis

<b>Background:</b> Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major global health concern, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Cirrhosis and liver cancer are the leading causes of liver-related deaths, with various etiological factors, such as metabolic disorders and alcohol-related and viral hepatitis, driving its global prevalence. Non-invasive biomarkers and scoring systems have emerged as key tools for assessing liver disease severity and differentiating CLD from cirrhosis. This study evaluates biomarkers and non-invasive scores and their utility in distinguishing CLD from cirrhosis. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study included 250 adult patients hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2023 at Cluj County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania. Patients were diagnosed with either cirrhosis or CLD of viral, autoimmune, or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) etiology. Non-invasive biomarkers, scores, and various hemogram-derived ratios were evaluated. Statistical analysis involved descriptive statistics, comparative tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 250 patients, 137 had liver cirrhosis (54.8%) and 113 had CLD without cirrhosis (45.2%). Significant differences were observed in laboratory parameters, with cirrhosis patients showing lower hemoglobin, platelet count, and albumin levels alongside higher liver enzymes and INR values. Non-invasive scores such as APRI, FIB-4, and NFS demonstrated higher values in the cirrhosis group, indicating more advanced liver damage. Hemogram-derived ratios, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), were higher in cirrhosis patients. ROC analysis revealed that the Lok index had the highest discriminatory power (AUC 0.89), followed by the King score (AUC 0.864) and the Fibrosis index (AUC 0.856), which effectively distinguished cirrhosis from CLD. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study underscores the utility of non-invasive biomarkers and scoring systems in differentiating CLD from cirrhosis. The Lok index, King score, and Fibrosis index demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy, while hemogram-derived ratios, such as NLR, offer insights into systemic inflammation associated with liver disease progression. These findings support the integration of non-invasive markers into clinical practice for improved risk stratification and management of liver diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093072
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Non-Invasive Scores and Hemogram-Derived Ratios in Differentiating Chronic Liver Disease from Cirrhosis

Daniel‐Corneliu Leucuta, Teodora Surdea‐Blaga, Dan L. Dumitraşcu, Abdulrahman Ismaiel et al.
6 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
8.13
article

The Impact of Non-Invasive Scores and Hemogram-Derived Ratios in Differentiating Chronic Liver Disease from Cirrhosis

Daniel‐Corneliu Leucuta, Teodora Surdea‐Blaga, Dan L. Dumitraşcu, Abdulrahman Ismaiel, Cristina-Sorina Cătană, Stefan‐Lucian Popa, Evrard Katell
article en
6 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major global health concern, contributing significantly to morbidity and mortality. Cirrhosis and liver cancer are the leading causes of liver-related deaths, with various etiological factors, such as metabolic disorders and alcohol-related and viral hepatitis, driving its global prevalence. Non-invasive biomarkers and scoring systems have emerged as key tools for assessing liver disease severity and differentiating CLD from cirrhosis. This study evaluates biomarkers and non-invasive scores and their utility in distinguishing CLD from cirrhosis. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study included 250 adult patients hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2023 at Cluj County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania. Patients were diagnosed with either cirrhosis or CLD of viral, autoimmune, or primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) etiology. Non-invasive biomarkers, scores, and various hemogram-derived ratios were evaluated. Statistical analysis involved descriptive statistics, comparative tests, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. <b>Results:</b> Among the 250 patients, 137 had liver cirrhosis (54.8%) and 113 had CLD without cirrhosis (45.2%). Significant differences were observed in laboratory parameters, with cirrhosis patients showing lower hemoglobin, platelet count, and albumin levels alongside higher liver enzymes and INR values. Non-invasive scores such as APRI, FIB-4, and NFS demonstrated higher values in the cirrhosis group, indicating more advanced liver damage. Hemogram-derived ratios, particularly the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), were higher in cirrhosis patients. ROC analysis revealed that the Lok index had the highest discriminatory power (AUC 0.89), followed by the King score (AUC 0.864) and the Fibrosis index (AUC 0.856), which effectively distinguished cirrhosis from CLD. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study underscores the utility of non-invasive biomarkers and scoring systems in differentiating CLD from cirrhosis. The Lok index, King score, and Fibrosis index demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy, while hemogram-derived ratios, such as NLR, offer insights into systemic inflammation associated with liver disease progression. These findings support the integration of non-invasive markers into clinical practice for improved risk stratification and management of liver diseases.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
8.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.