Impact of Single-Lumen Versus Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube on Postoperative Swallowing Function in Lung Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The role of double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) versus single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLT) use during lung transplantation (LTx) and its effects on postoperative dysphagia have not yet been studied. It has been shown that new-onset oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) is common after various thoracic surgeries including lung transplantation and that OPD is associated with increased postoperative complications. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed using a data exploration tool in the electronic medical record. Data included demographic characteristics, medical history, postoperative dysphagia measured by Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) via modified barium swallow study (MBSS) within 5 days of surgery, and other secondary outcomes. <b>Results:</b> In univariate analysis, participants who had a DLT (49 patients) had significantly higher FOIS scores (indicating better swallowing function) as compared to those with an SLT (21 patients) (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Lumen type remained significant in a multivariable model, with use of a DLT showing more than a 5-fold increase in the odds of a higher FOIS score after controlling for other factors (<i>p</i> = 0.004; cumulative OR (95% CI): 5.2 (1.7-15.9)). Participants who had a DLT had shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (<i>p</i> = 0.017; single 18 days (IQR = 13), double 14 days (IQR 7)). Those who had a DLT experienced significantly greater ventilator-free time at postoperative day 30 compared to those who received an SLT (<i>p</i> = 0.018). ICU LOS was similar between those who received a DLT vs. SLT. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, DLT seems to confer reduced new-onset OPD after lung transplantation surgery when compared with SLT. The use of DLT instead of SLT for lung isolation for LTx may have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093075
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Single-Lumen Versus Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube on Postoperative Swallowing Function in Lung Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Loren Francis, Haley Nitchie, Carolyn Taylor, Bethany J. Wolf et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Impact of Single-Lumen Versus Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube on Postoperative Swallowing Function in Lung Transplantation Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study

Loren Francis, Haley Nitchie, Carolyn Taylor, Bethany J. Wolf, Rishi Patel
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The role of double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) versus single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLT) use during lung transplantation (LTx) and its effects on postoperative dysphagia have not yet been studied. It has been shown that new-onset oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) is common after various thoracic surgeries including lung transplantation and that OPD is associated with increased postoperative complications. <b>Methods</b>: A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed using a data exploration tool in the electronic medical record. Data included demographic characteristics, medical history, postoperative dysphagia measured by Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) via modified barium swallow study (MBSS) within 5 days of surgery, and other secondary outcomes. <b>Results:</b> In univariate analysis, participants who had a DLT (49 patients) had significantly higher FOIS scores (indicating better swallowing function) as compared to those with an SLT (21 patients) (<i>p</i> = 0.035). Lumen type remained significant in a multivariable model, with use of a DLT showing more than a 5-fold increase in the odds of a higher FOIS score after controlling for other factors (<i>p</i> = 0.004; cumulative OR (95% CI): 5.2 (1.7-15.9)). Participants who had a DLT had shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) (<i>p</i> = 0.017; single 18 days (IQR = 13), double 14 days (IQR 7)). Those who had a DLT experienced significantly greater ventilator-free time at postoperative day 30 compared to those who received an SLT (<i>p</i> = 0.018). ICU LOS was similar between those who received a DLT vs. SLT. <b>Conclusions</b>: Overall, DLT seems to confer reduced new-onset OPD after lung transplantation surgery when compared with SLT. The use of DLT instead of SLT for lung isolation for LTx may have the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality in this population.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.