SEM and Bacteriological Evidence of Laser-Activated Irrigation Compared to Ultrasonic-Activated Irrigation: A Pilot Study

<b>Background:</b> Pulp tissue debridement and the eradication of microorganisms from an infected root canal system before obturation is a primary focus of endodontic treatment and the best predictor for the long-term success of endodontic treatment. <b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this in vitro laboratory study was to evaluate pulp tissue debridement and the disinfection efficacy of two different Er;Cr:YSGG laser units, with a 2790 nm wavelength, compared to ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI) in root canals infected with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. <b>Methods:</b> Human non-infected mandibular first molars were extracted, disinfected, and cultured with <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>. Different types of Er;Cr:YSGG laser irrigation and UAI were performed according to the manufacturers' protocols. The teeth were then processed for bacteriological and SEM analyses. <b>Results:</b> The different laser-activated irrigation protocols showed multiple areas of remaining bacteria, biofilm, tissue, and thermal ablation. The laser fiber tips also displayed significant tip degradation after use, which might affect efficacy. <b>Conclusions:</b> In this in vitro study, laser-activated irrigation using Er;Cr:YSGG technology and UAI were inefficient in eliminating pulp tissue from difficult-to-reach areas and <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> from infected root canals.