Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Screen for Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at risk of developing multiple complications, and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is by far the most common. The purpose of the present study was to assess the ability of a new algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) to identify patients with T2D who are at risk of DPN in order to move on to further instrumental evaluation with the biothesiometer method. <b>Methods</b>: This is a single-centre, cross-sectional study with 201 consecutive T2D patients recruited at the Diabetes Operating Unit of the ULSS 6 of Padua (Northeast Italy). The individual risk of developing DPN was calculated using the AI-based MetaClinic Prediction Algorithm and compared with the DPN diagnosis provided by the digital biothesiometer method, which measures the vibratory perception threshold (VPT) on both feet. <b>Results</b>: Of the enrolled patients, 107 (53.23%) were classified by AI software as having a low probability of developing DPN, 39 (19.40%) as having a moderate probability, 29 (14.43%) as having a high probability, and 26 (12.94%) as having a very high probability. In 63 of the total patients, biothesiometer measurement showed a VPT ≥ 25 V, indicative of DPN, while 138 patients had a non-pathological VPT value (< 25 V) (prevalence of abnormal VPT 31.34%; prevalence of normal VPT 68.66%). The overall agreement between biothesiometer results and AI risk attribution was 65%. Cohen's κ was 0.162, and Gwet's AC1 coefficient 0.405. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of an optimized AI algorithm can help estimate the risk of developing DPN, thereby guiding more targeted and in-depth screening, including instrumental assessment using the biothesiometer method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051075
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Screen for Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study

Francesco Piarulli, F. Pegoraro, Annunziata Lapolla, Eugenio Ragazzi et al.
4 citations
Biomedicines
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
11.75
article

Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Screen for Diabetic Neuropathy: A Pilot Study

Francesco Piarulli, F. Pegoraro, Annunziata Lapolla, Eugenio Ragazzi, Giovanni Sartore, Mario German Pagno
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at risk of developing multiple complications, and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is by far the most common. The purpose of the present study was to assess the ability of a new algorithm based on artificial intelligence (AI) to identify patients with T2D who are at risk of DPN in order to move on to further instrumental evaluation with the biothesiometer method. <b>Methods</b>: This is a single-centre, cross-sectional study with 201 consecutive T2D patients recruited at the Diabetes Operating Unit of the ULSS 6 of Padua (Northeast Italy). The individual risk of developing DPN was calculated using the AI-based MetaClinic Prediction Algorithm and compared with the DPN diagnosis provided by the digital biothesiometer method, which measures the vibratory perception threshold (VPT) on both feet. <b>Results</b>: Of the enrolled patients, 107 (53.23%) were classified by AI software as having a low probability of developing DPN, 39 (19.40%) as having a moderate probability, 29 (14.43%) as having a high probability, and 26 (12.94%) as having a very high probability. In 63 of the total patients, biothesiometer measurement showed a VPT ≥ 25 V, indicative of DPN, while 138 patients had a non-pathological VPT value (< 25 V) (prevalence of abnormal VPT 31.34%; prevalence of normal VPT 68.66%). The overall agreement between biothesiometer results and AI risk attribution was 65%. Cohen's κ was 0.162, and Gwet's AC1 coefficient 0.405. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of an optimized AI algorithm can help estimate the risk of developing DPN, thereby guiding more targeted and in-depth screening, including instrumental assessment using the biothesiometer method.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(5)
University of Padua (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
11.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.