A Phase <scp>II</scp> Trial of Geriatric Assessment‐Guided Selection of Treatment Intensity in Older Adults With <scp>AML</scp>

How to select the appropriate intensity of chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains an unanswered question. In a phase II trial of older adults ≥ 60 years with AML (n = 73), we used geriatric assessment (measures of comorbidity burden, physical and cognitive function) to determine fitness for intensive chemotherapy. We integrated the geriatric assessment and genetic test results to personalize the selection of chemotherapy intensity with a goal to reduce early mortality (NCT03226418). Broad eligibility criteria allowed enrolling patients representative of those treated in real-world practices: 45% of patients were ≥ 70 years, 57% had ≥ 2 comorbidities, 27% had a history of solid malignancies, and 74% had impairments in ≥ 2 geriatric assessment domains used to assign treatment intensity. Thirty-two percent of patients resided in rural areas, and 45% were comanaged with community oncologists. The median time from enrollment to therapy initiation was 1 day (range 0-13). Eight patients (11%) received intensive chemotherapy; others received low-intensity chemotherapy. Mortality at 30 days from diagnosis was 6.8% (95% confidence interval, CI 3.0%-15.1%) and at 90 days was 21.9% (95% CI 14.0%-32.7%). One-year survival was 45.9% (95% CI 35.6%-59.3%). Our study demonstrates that pre-treatment geriatric assessment in older adults with AML is feasible, can identify several functional impairments, and guide the selection of treatment intensity. A randomized trial is necessary to confirm the survival benefit of this approach over the traditional approach of treatment selection. Trial Registration: NCT03226418.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hematology
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.27694
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Phase II Trial of Geriatric Assessment‐Guided Selection of Treatment Intensity in Older Adults With AML

Christopher Wichman, Sarah A. Holstein, Ann M. Berger, Michael Haddadin et al.
6 citations
American Journal of Hematology
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
10.62
article

A Phase II Trial of Geriatric Assessment‐Guided Selection of Treatment Intensity in Older Adults With AML

Christopher Wichman, Sarah A. Holstein, Ann M. Berger, Michael Haddadin, Thuy T. Koll, Lori J. Maness, Vijaya Raj Bhatt, Jamés O. Armitage, Krishna Gundabolu, Tanya M. Wildes, Alfred L. Fisher
article en
6 citations

Abstract

How to select the appropriate intensity of chemotherapy in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains an unanswered question. In a phase II trial of older adults ≥ 60 years with AML (n = 73), we used geriatric assessment (measures of comorbidity burden, physical and cognitive function) to determine fitness for intensive chemotherapy. We integrated the geriatric assessment and genetic test results to personalize the selection of chemotherapy intensity with a goal to reduce early mortality (NCT03226418). Broad eligibility criteria allowed enrolling patients representative of those treated in real-world practices: 45% of patients were ≥ 70 years, 57% had ≥ 2 comorbidities, 27% had a history of solid malignancies, and 74% had impairments in ≥ 2 geriatric assessment domains used to assign treatment intensity. Thirty-two percent of patients resided in rural areas, and 45% were comanaged with community oncologists. The median time from enrollment to therapy initiation was 1 day (range 0-13). Eight patients (11%) received intensive chemotherapy; others received low-intensity chemotherapy. Mortality at 30 days from diagnosis was 6.8% (95% confidence interval, CI 3.0%-15.1%) and at 90 days was 21.9% (95% CI 14.0%-32.7%). One-year survival was 45.9% (95% CI 35.6%-59.3%). Our study demonstrates that pre-treatment geriatric assessment in older adults with AML is feasible, can identify several functional impairments, and guide the selection of treatment intensity. A randomized trial is necessary to confirm the survival benefit of this approach over the traditional approach of treatment selection. Trial Registration: NCT03226418.

American Journal of HematologyVol. 100(7)
University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
10.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.