Property and contract in a climate of disruption: just processes for change in private agreements made for public purposes that burden land

Abstract This article analyses how private agreements that burden land respond to environmental and social change. It argues that, where there is a public environmental purpose, this should be reflected in the legal rules governing the agreement. It explores the alteration of conservation covenants by judicial process in English law, focusing on the public dimensions of justice. How could private law recognize better the responsibilities that covenants generate to human and non-human publics? Doctrinal changes to the Environment Act 2021 are suggested, including the introduction of a presumption against judicial alteration of a conservation covenant where there are ongoing conservation purposes, complemented by changes to how judicial discretion is exercised. The hybrid public-private nature of conservation covenants also demands new procedural forms. Further opportunities for human publics to participate, perhaps modelled on those found in land-use planning law, as well as exploration of new means of engaging with non-human publics, are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Property Law Journal
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/eplj-2025-0002
Primary Topic
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Property and contract in a climate of disruption: just processes for change in private agreements made for public purposes that burden land

Bonnie Holligan
European Property Law Journal
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
article

Property and contract in a climate of disruption: just processes for change in private agreements made for public purposes that burden land

Bonnie Holligan
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses how private agreements that burden land respond to environmental and social change. It argues that, where there is a public environmental purpose, this should be reflected in the legal rules governing the agreement. It explores the alteration of conservation covenants by judicial process in English law, focusing on the public dimensions of justice. How could private law recognize better the responsibilities that covenants generate to human and non-human publics? Doctrinal changes to the Environment Act 2021 are suggested, including the introduction of a presumption against judicial alteration of a conservation covenant where there are ongoing conservation purposes, complemented by changes to how judicial discretion is exercised. The hybrid public-private nature of conservation covenants also demands new procedural forms. Further opportunities for human publics to participate, perhaps modelled on those found in land-use planning law, as well as exploration of new means of engaging with non-human publics, are needed.

European Property Law JournalVol. 14(1)
University of Sussex (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.