Prodexchange: Digital–industrial economization in Google Search supply chain

Using Google as a case study, this paper analyzes the online advertising sector's search industry. Arguing that search engines are not engines, it examines Google Search as a supply chain composed of five nodes: Crawler, Indexer, Ranker, Publisher, and Data Center. The final product of this chain is the search service presented to Google consumers, complete with ads and ancillary information. Empirically showing that production and exchange are one economic process in most of these supply chain nodes, we argue that treating them separately is neither accurate for description nor feasible for theory. In reality, Google Search produces and exchanges simultaneously. We observe that the social sciences lack an approach to analyze such unitary production/exchange relations in computational industries. Addressing this blind spot, the paper offers an alternative to describe how the search industry works by bridging supply chain literature in management and the economization approach in sociology. We introduce the digital–industrial economization approach to analyze Google Search's supply chain, in which a variety of nodes concurrently produce, exchange, barter, maintain, and/or store search products and their inputs. We present the term prodexchange to characterize these novel integrated production/exchange combinations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Platforms & Society
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768624251337868
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prodexchange: Digital–industrial economization in Google Search supply chain

Addie McGowan, Donald MacKenzie, Koray Çalışkan
1 citations
Platforms & Society
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
article

Prodexchange: Digital–industrial economization in Google Search supply chain

Addie McGowan, Donald MacKenzie, Koray Çalışkan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using Google as a case study, this paper analyzes the online advertising sector's search industry. Arguing that search engines are not engines, it examines Google Search as a supply chain composed of five nodes: Crawler, Indexer, Ranker, Publisher, and Data Center. The final product of this chain is the search service presented to Google consumers, complete with ads and ancillary information. Empirically showing that production and exchange are one economic process in most of these supply chain nodes, we argue that treating them separately is neither accurate for description nor feasible for theory. In reality, Google Search produces and exchanges simultaneously. We observe that the social sciences lack an approach to analyze such unitary production/exchange relations in computational industries. Addressing this blind spot, the paper offers an alternative to describe how the search industry works by bridging supply chain literature in management and the economization approach in sociology. We introduce the digital–industrial economization approach to analyze Google Search's supply chain, in which a variety of nodes concurrently produce, exchange, barter, maintain, and/or store search products and their inputs. We present the term prodexchange to characterize these novel integrated production/exchange combinations.

Platforms & SocietyVol. 2
The New School (US), NewSchool of Architecture and Design (US), Parsons School of Design (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.