Buy Baits and Consumer Sophistication: Field Evidence from Instant Rebates

Are consumers in the marketplace aware of their cognitive limitations? I answer this question in the context of a ubiquitous form of price discrimination: instant rebates that require active redemption. In a large-scale field experiment with a major online retailer, I find that consumers correctly increase demand when the firm offers a redemption reminder, but they fail to reduce demand when the firm increases the hassle required to redeem. Structural estimates reveal that, while consumers are sophisticated about the probability of forgetting to redeem the rebate, they vastly underestimate the hassle of redeeming it by €20 per consumer. (JEL C93, D12, D83, D91, L81, M31)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20230358
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Buy Baits and Consumer Sophistication: Field Evidence from Instant Rebates

Matthias Rodemeier
1 citations
American Economic Journal Economic Policy
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
article

Buy Baits and Consumer Sophistication: Field Evidence from Instant Rebates

Matthias Rodemeier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Are consumers in the marketplace aware of their cognitive limitations? I answer this question in the context of a ubiquitous form of price discrimination: instant rebates that require active redemption. In a large-scale field experiment with a major online retailer, I find that consumers correctly increase demand when the firm offers a redemption reminder, but they fail to reduce demand when the firm increases the hassle required to redeem. Structural estimates reveal that, while consumers are sophisticated about the probability of forgetting to redeem the rebate, they vastly underestimate the hassle of redeeming it by €20 per consumer. (JEL C93, D12, D83, D91, L81, M31)

American Economic Journal Economic PolicyVol. 17(2)
Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.