Colonial Logics in Rust Belt Revitalization: Rethinking State-led Gentrification

Scholars have questioned the analytic utility of gentrification theories when applied to declining Rust Belt cities. In these contexts, scholars suggest the state may play a more significant role in instigating gentrification. This article builds on recent scholarship at the intersection of colonialism, race, and urban studies to examine eight regulatory changes aimed at quelling decline and promoting revitalization in Detroit, Michigan that were rolled out during a pivotal period in the city’s recent history. We argue that these state interventions reflect and reproduce a settler colonial replacement logic: they threaten marginalized, primarily Black residents’ informal and legal relations to the city and its resources, while simultaneously striving to attract newcomers and expand their legal ownership of city land and property. These findings illustrate another way settler colonialism continues to shape contemporary dynamics in the United States and implicates city and state regulations as key instigators of urban revitalization in declining cities struggling with segregation and hypervacancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
City and Community
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15356841251330239
Primary Topic
Urbanization and City Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colonial Logics in Rust Belt Revitalization: Rethinking State-led Gentrification

Michael Brown, Claire W. Herbert
City and Community
Urbanization and City Planning
article

Colonial Logics in Rust Belt Revitalization: Rethinking State-led Gentrification

Michael Brown, Claire W. Herbert
article en

Abstract

Scholars have questioned the analytic utility of gentrification theories when applied to declining Rust Belt cities. In these contexts, scholars suggest the state may play a more significant role in instigating gentrification. This article builds on recent scholarship at the intersection of colonialism, race, and urban studies to examine eight regulatory changes aimed at quelling decline and promoting revitalization in Detroit, Michigan that were rolled out during a pivotal period in the city’s recent history. We argue that these state interventions reflect and reproduce a settler colonial replacement logic: they threaten marginalized, primarily Black residents’ informal and legal relations to the city and its resources, while simultaneously striving to attract newcomers and expand their legal ownership of city land and property. These findings illustrate another way settler colonialism continues to shape contemporary dynamics in the United States and implicates city and state regulations as key instigators of urban revitalization in declining cities struggling with segregation and hypervacancy.

City and CommunityVol. 24(3)
University of Oregon (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Urbanization and City Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Colonial Logics in Rust Belt Revitalization: Rethinking State-led Gentrification — Michael Brown, Claire W. Herbert · City and Community (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS