A Multi-Feature Automatic Evaluation of the Aesthetics of 3D Printed Surfaces

Additive manufacturing is one of the continuously developing areas of technology that still requires reliable monitoring and quality assessment of obtained products. Considering the relatively long time necessary for manufacturing larger products, one of the most desired solutions is video quality monitoring of the manufactured object’s surface. This makes it possible to stop the printing process if the quality is unacceptable. It helps to save the filament, energy, and time, preventing the production of items with poor aesthetic quality. In the paper, several approaches to image-based surface quality assessment are discussed and combined towards a high correlation with the subjective perception of typical quality degradations of the 3D printed surfaces, exceeding 0.9. Although one of the most significant limitations of using full-reference image quality-assessment metrics might be the lack of reference images, it can be overcome by using mutual similarity calculated for image regions. For the created dataset containing 107 samples with subjective aesthetic quality scores, it is shown that the combination of even two metrics using their weighted sum and product significantly outperforms any elementary metric or feature when considering correlations with subjective quality scores.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2025-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094852
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Feature Automatic Evaluation of the Aesthetics of 3D Printed Surfaces

Jarosław Fastowicz, Mateusz Tecław, Krzysztof Okarma
Applied Sciences
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

A Multi-Feature Automatic Evaluation of the Aesthetics of 3D Printed Surfaces

Jarosław Fastowicz, Mateusz Tecław, Krzysztof Okarma
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing is one of the continuously developing areas of technology that still requires reliable monitoring and quality assessment of obtained products. Considering the relatively long time necessary for manufacturing larger products, one of the most desired solutions is video quality monitoring of the manufactured object’s surface. This makes it possible to stop the printing process if the quality is unacceptable. It helps to save the filament, energy, and time, preventing the production of items with poor aesthetic quality. In the paper, several approaches to image-based surface quality assessment are discussed and combined towards a high correlation with the subjective perception of typical quality degradations of the 3D printed surfaces, exceeding 0.9. Although one of the most significant limitations of using full-reference image quality-assessment metrics might be the lack of reference images, it can be overcome by using mutual similarity calculated for image regions. For the created dataset containing 107 samples with subjective aesthetic quality scores, it is shown that the combination of even two metrics using their weighted sum and product significantly outperforms any elementary metric or feature when considering correlations with subjective quality scores.

Applied SciencesVol. 15(9)
West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Multi-Feature Automatic Evaluation of the Aesthetics of 3D Printed Surfaces — Jarosław Fastowicz, Mateusz Tecław, et al. · Applied Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS