Pool more, drive less: An investigation of barriers and motivators of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles

• This study investigates potential users’ motivations and barriers to share rides in autonomous vehicles. • In-depth interviews are conducted with a diverse range of participants. • Relevant factors that promote the acceptance of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles are summarised and explored. • Perceptions of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles are ambivalent and depend on users’ current mobility habits. • Future autonomous ridepooling services should be developed based on user-centric approaches. The integration of on-demand ridepooling services provided by autonomous vehicles into transportation systems offers a solution to mobility challenges in the future. If such services effectively enable travellers to share a vehicle instead of driving alone, higher vehicle occupancy rates would lead to a more efficient use of existing road infrastructure. This in turn could help alleviate traffic congestion and its associated drawbacks. The acceptance of such autonomous ridepooling (aRP) services by prospective users is essential for their successful adoption. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to uncover the relevant factors that determine aRP acceptance and to better understand the drivers and barriers of aRP acceptance using a user-centered approach. Through 18 semi-structured in-depth interviews with a diverse range of participants, the study revealed the significance of performance expectations with regards to safety, comfort, flexibility, sustainability, and social aspects in shaping acceptance for aRP. Notably, ambivalent attitudes and controversial perceptions of these factors as well as differences between public transport and private car users underscore the importance of customer segmentation and tailored strategies for the design and promotion of aRP services. Findings emphasize the need for aRP services to prioritize user-centric approaches to enable the adoption and facilitate the integration of aRP as a more sustainable option into future transportation systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101427
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pool more, drive less: An investigation of barriers and motivators of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles

Alexander Erath, Nora Studer, Dorothea Schaffner, Michael A.B. van Eggermond et al.
1 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.68
article

Pool more, drive less: An investigation of barriers and motivators of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles

Alexander Erath, Nora Studer, Dorothea Schaffner, Michael A.B. van Eggermond, Nicole Haiderer, Annalisa Stefanelli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• This study investigates potential users’ motivations and barriers to share rides in autonomous vehicles. • In-depth interviews are conducted with a diverse range of participants. • Relevant factors that promote the acceptance of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles are summarised and explored. • Perceptions of ridepooling in autonomous vehicles are ambivalent and depend on users’ current mobility habits. • Future autonomous ridepooling services should be developed based on user-centric approaches. The integration of on-demand ridepooling services provided by autonomous vehicles into transportation systems offers a solution to mobility challenges in the future. If such services effectively enable travellers to share a vehicle instead of driving alone, higher vehicle occupancy rates would lead to a more efficient use of existing road infrastructure. This in turn could help alleviate traffic congestion and its associated drawbacks. The acceptance of such autonomous ridepooling (aRP) services by prospective users is essential for their successful adoption. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to uncover the relevant factors that determine aRP acceptance and to better understand the drivers and barriers of aRP acceptance using a user-centered approach. Through 18 semi-structured in-depth interviews with a diverse range of participants, the study revealed the significance of performance expectations with regards to safety, comfort, flexibility, sustainability, and social aspects in shaping acceptance for aRP. Notably, ambivalent attitudes and controversial perceptions of these factors as well as differences between public transport and private car users underscore the importance of customer segmentation and tailored strategies for the design and promotion of aRP services. Findings emphasize the need for aRP services to prioritize user-centric approaches to enable the adoption and facilitate the integration of aRP as a more sustainable option into future transportation systems.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 31
FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH), Institute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.