Biomechanical Performance and Handling of Mineral–Organic Adhesive Bone Cements Based on Magnesium Under Clinical Test Conditions

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Biomineral adhesive bone adhesives composed of phosphoserine combined with magnesium oxides or phosphates exhibit exceptional adhesive properties. This study evaluates two experimental mineral-organic cementitious adhesives in a clinical test setup, investigating their potential for fracture reduction and simultaneous defect filling. <b>Methods</b>: The two experimental adhesives (Groups B and C) and a standard hydroxyapatite cement (Group A, reference) underwent compressive strength testing, shear strength testing, and screw pullout tests as part of a first biomechanical characterization. Furthermore, all materials were tested in a porcine tibial split depression fracture model, where they served both for fracture reduction and for filling the metaphyseal bone defect, supplementary to plate osteosynthesis. Fracture stability was assessed under cyclic loading in a materials testing machine. <b>Results</b>: The OPLS (O-phospho-L-serine) containing adhesive (Group B) demonstrated the highest compressive strength as well as the highest shear strength. All three materials showed comparable maximum pullout forces. Both experimental adhesives (Groups B and C) exhibited higher pullout stiffness compared to the standard cement (Group A). In the fracture model, no significant differences in displacement under cyclic loading were observed between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: The biomineral adhesive bone adhesives (Groups B and C) demonstrated biomechanical advantages in axial compression, adhesive (shear) strength, and screw fixation compared to the standard hydroxyapatite cement (Group A). Furthermore, they achieved comparable stabilization of metaphyseal fractures under clinically relevant dynamic loading conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093081
Primary Topic
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomechanical Performance and Handling of Mineral–Organic Adhesive Bone Cements Based on Magnesium Under Clinical Test Conditions

Eva Kupczyk, Uwe Gbureck, Rainer H. Meffert, A. Fabian et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
article

Biomechanical Performance and Handling of Mineral–Organic Adhesive Bone Cements Based on Magnesium Under Clinical Test Conditions

Eva Kupczyk, Uwe Gbureck, Rainer H. Meffert, A. Fabian, Lasse Boegelein, Tobias Renner, Stefanie Hoelscher-Doht
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Biomineral adhesive bone adhesives composed of phosphoserine combined with magnesium oxides or phosphates exhibit exceptional adhesive properties. This study evaluates two experimental mineral-organic cementitious adhesives in a clinical test setup, investigating their potential for fracture reduction and simultaneous defect filling. <b>Methods</b>: The two experimental adhesives (Groups B and C) and a standard hydroxyapatite cement (Group A, reference) underwent compressive strength testing, shear strength testing, and screw pullout tests as part of a first biomechanical characterization. Furthermore, all materials were tested in a porcine tibial split depression fracture model, where they served both for fracture reduction and for filling the metaphyseal bone defect, supplementary to plate osteosynthesis. Fracture stability was assessed under cyclic loading in a materials testing machine. <b>Results</b>: The OPLS (O-phospho-L-serine) containing adhesive (Group B) demonstrated the highest compressive strength as well as the highest shear strength. All three materials showed comparable maximum pullout forces. Both experimental adhesives (Groups B and C) exhibited higher pullout stiffness compared to the standard cement (Group A). In the fracture model, no significant differences in displacement under cyclic loading were observed between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: The biomineral adhesive bone adhesives (Groups B and C) demonstrated biomechanical advantages in axial compression, adhesive (shear) strength, and screw fixation compared to the standard hydroxyapatite cement (Group A). Furthermore, they achieved comparable stabilization of metaphyseal fractures under clinically relevant dynamic loading conditions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(9)
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.